Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diverse cell signalling pathways regulate pollen‐stigma interactions: the search for consensus

Hiscock, Simon J., Allen, Alexandra M.·2008·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Siphonogamy, the delivery of nonmotile sperm to the egg via a pollen tube, was a key innovation that allowed flowering plants (angiosperms) to carry out sexual reproduction on land without the need for water. This process begins with a pollen grain (male gametophyte) alighting on and adhering to the stigma of a flower. If conditions are right, the pollen grain germinates to produce a pollen tube. The pollen tube invades the stigma and grows through the style towards the ovary, where it enters an ovule, penetrates the embryo sac (female gametophyte) and releases two sperm cells, one of which fertilizes the egg, while the other fuses with the two polar nuclei of the central cell to form the triploid endosperm. The events before fertilization (pollen–pistil interactions) comprise a series of complex cellular interactions involving a continuous exchange of signals between the haploid pollen and the diploid maternal tissue of the pistil (sporophyte). In recent years, significant progress has been made in elucidating the molecular identity of these signals and the cellular interactions that they regulate. Here we review our current understanding of the cellular and molecular interactions that mediate the earliest of these interactions between the pollen and the pistil that occur on or within the stigma – the ‘pollen–stigma interaction’. ContentsSummary286I.Introduction287II.The pollen–stigma interaction289III.Pollen–stigma interactions in species with wet stigmas290IV.Pollen–stigma interactions in species with dry stigmas295V.Is there any consensus among cell signalling pathways regulating pollen–stigma interactions?299VI.Incompatibility and the pollen–stigma interaction300VII.New directions in pollen–stigma interaction research302VIII.Future prospects310Acknowledgements312References312

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02457.x

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 119 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Hiscock, S. J., & Allen, A. M.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06-28
Volume
179
Issue
2
Pages
286-317
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2094580636
Cited by
255
References
119
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diverse cell signalling pathways regulate pollen‐stigma interactions: the search for consensus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02457.x
The paper
Hiscock, S. J., & Allen, A. M. (2008). Diverse cell signalling pathways regulate pollen‐stigma interactions: the search for consensus. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02457.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.