The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular physiology of adventitious root formation in Petunia hybrida cuttings: involvement of wound response and primary metabolism
Abstract
Adventitious root formation (ARF) in the model plant Petunia hybrida cv. Mitchell has been analysed in terms of anatomy, gene expression, enzymatic activities and levels of metabolites. This study focuses on the involvement of wound response and primary metabolism. Microscopic techniques were complemented with targeted transcript, enzyme and metabolite profiling using real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Northern blot, enzymatic assays, chromatography and mass spectrometry. Three days after severance from the stock plants, first meristematic cells appeared which further developed into root primordia and finally adventitious roots. Excision of cuttings led to a fast and transient increase in the wound-hormone jasmonic acid, followed by the expression of jasmonate-regulated genes such as cell wall invertase. Analysis of soluble and insoluble carbohydrates showed a continuous accumulation during ARF. A broad metabolite profiling revealed a strong increase in organic acids and resynthesis of essential amino acids. Substantial changes in enzyme activities and metabolite levels indicate that specific enzymes and metabolites might play a crucial role during ARF. Three metabolic phases could be defined: (i) sink establishment phase characterized by apoplastic unloading of sucrose and being probably mediated by jasmonates; (ii) recovery phase; and (iii) maintenance phase, in which a symplastic unloading occurs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wasternack, C., & Hause, B. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mct067 · Cited by 2,629
Self-citationAdventitious Roots and Lateral Roots: Similarities and Differences
Bellini, C., Pacurar, D. I., & Perrone, I. (2014) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035645 · Cited by 624
The Physiology of Adventitious Roots
Steffens, B., & Rasmussen, A. (2016) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.15.01360 · Cited by 621
Plant regeneration: cellular origins and molecular mechanisms
Ikeuchi, M., Ogawa, Y., Iwase, A., & Sugimoto, K. (2016) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.134668 · Cited by 592
Liu, J., Sheng, L., Xu, Y., Li, J., Yang, Z., Huang, H., & Xu, L. (2014) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.114.122887 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahkami, A. H., Lischewski, S., Haensch, K., Porfirova, S., Hofmann, J., Rolletschek, H., Melzer, M., Franken, P., Hause, B., Druege, U., & Hajirezaei, M. R.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-05
- Volume
- 181
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 613-625
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2123939640
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular physiology of adventitious root formation in Petunia hybrida cuttings: involvement of wound response and primary metabolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02704.x
- The paper
- Ahkami, A. H., Lischewski, S., Haensch, K., Porfirova, S., Hofmann, J., Rolletschek, H., Melzer, M., Franken, P., Hause, B., Druege, U., & Hajirezaei, M. R. (2009). Molecular physiology of adventitious root formation in Petunia hybrida cuttings: involvement of wound response and primary metabolism. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02704.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.