The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental sensor networks in ecological research
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Environmental sensor networks offer a powerful combination of distributed sensing capacity, real‐time data visualization and analysis, and integration with adjacent networks and remote sensing data streams. These advances have become a reality as a combined result of the continuing miniaturization of electronics, the availability of large data storage and computational capacity, and the pervasive connectivity of the Internet. Environmental sensor networks have been established and large new networks are planned for monitoring multiple habitats at many different scales. Projects range in spatial scale from continental systems designed to measure global change and environmental stability to those involved with the monitoring of only a few meters of forest edge in fragmented landscapes. Temporal measurements have ranged from the evaluation of sunfleck dynamics at scales of seconds, to daily CO 2 fluxes, to decadal shifts in temperatures. Above‐ground sensor systems are partnered with subsurface soil measurement networks for physical and biological activity, together with aquatic and riparian sensor networks to measure groundwater fluxes and nutrient dynamics. More recently, complex sensors, such as networked digital cameras and microphones, as well as newly emerging sensors, are being integrated into sensor networks for hierarchical methods of sensing that promise a further understanding of our ecological systems by revealing previously unobservable phenomena. Contents Summary 589 I. Introduction 590 II. Terrestrial sensor networks 591 III. Soil sensor networks 594 IV. Aquatic sensor networks 597 V. Challenges for sensor network development 601 Acknowledgements 1063 References 1063
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dynamic ocean management: defining and conceptualizing real-time management of the ocean
Maxwell, S. M., Hazen, E. L., Lewison, R. L., Dunn, D. C., Bailey, H., Bograd, S. J., Briscoe, D. K., Fossette, S., Hobday, A. J., Bennett, M., et al. (2015) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.014 · Cited by 504
Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science
Michener, W. K., & Jones, M. B. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.016 · Cited by 441
IoT Based Real-time River Water Quality Monitoring System
Chowdury, M. S. U., Emran, T. B., Ghosh, S., Pathak, A., Alam, M. M., Absar, N., Andersson, K., & Hossain, M. S. (2019) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.08.025 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Rundel, P. W., Graham, E. A., Allen, M. F., Fisher, J. C., & Harmon, T. C.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-16
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 589-607
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2149917905
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental sensor networks in ecological research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02811.x
- The paper
- Rundel, P. W., Graham, E. A., Allen, M. F., Fisher, J. C., & Harmon, T. C. (2009). Environmental sensor networks in ecological research. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02811.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.