Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 742

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Copper homeostasis

Burkhead, Jason L., Gogolin Reynolds, Kathryn A., Abdel‐Ghany, Salah E., Cohu, Christopher M., Pilon, Marinus·2009·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Copper (Cu) is a cofactor in proteins that are involved in electron transfer reactions and is an essential micronutrient for plants. Copper delivery is accomplished by the concerted action of a set of evolutionarily conserved transporters and metallochaperones. As a result of regulation of transporters in the root and the rarity of natural soils with high Cu levels, very few plants in nature will experience Cu in toxic excess in their tissues. However, low Cu bioavailability can limit plant productivity and plants have an interesting response to impending Cu deficiency, which is regulated by an evolutionarily conserved master switch. When Cu supply is insufficient, systems to increase uptake are activated and the available Cu is utilized with economy. A number of Cu‐regulated small RNA molecules, the Cu‐microRNAs, are used to downregulate Cu proteins that are seemingly not essential. On low Cu, the Cu‐microRNAs are upregulated by the master Cu‐responsive transcription factor SPL7, which also activates expression of genes involved in Cu assimilation. This regulation allows the most important proteins, which are required for photo‐autotrophic growth, to remain active over a wide range of Cu concentrations and this should broaden the range where plants can thrive. Contents Summary 799 I. Introduction 800 II. The origins of Cu homeostasis 800 III. Copper homeostasis in unicellular photosynthetic model organisms 801 IV. Functions of Cu in plants 802 V. Typical levels of Cu in plants, deficiency and toxicity 802 VI. Copper abundance in soils and appropriate Cu concentrations in media 804 VII. Uptake in the root and distribution to aerial tissues 804 VIII. Uptake in the shoot symplast, redistribution of Cu during flowering, seed set and senescence 806 IX. Cu delivery inside the cell 806 X. Regulation of Cu homeostasis 809 XI. Conclusions and outlook 811 Acknowledgements 811 References 811

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02846.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 742

Metadata

Authors
Burkhead, J. L., Gogolin Reynolds, K. A., Abdel‐Ghany, S. E., Cohu, C. M., & Pilon, M.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-23
Volume
182
Issue
4
Pages
799-816
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W4211239380
Cited by
742
References
1
FWCI
29.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Copper homeostasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02846.x
The paper
Burkhead, J. L., Gogolin Reynolds, K. A., Abdel‐Ghany, S. E., Cohu, C. M., & Pilon, M. (2009). Copper homeostasis. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02846.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.