The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fitness costs associated with evolved herbicide resistance alleles in plants
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Predictions based on evolutionary theory suggest that the adaptive value of evolved herbicide resistance alleles may be compromised by the existence of fitness costs. There have been many studies quantifying the fitness costs associated with novel herbicide resistance alleles, reflecting the importance of fitness costs in determining the evolutionary dynamics of resistance. However, many of these studies have incorrectly defined resistance or used inappropriate plant material and methods to measure fitness. This review has two major objectives. First, to propose a methodological framework that establishes experimental criteria to unequivocally evaluate fitness costs. Second, to present a comprehensive analysis of the literature on fitness costs associated with herbicide resistance alleles. This analysis reveals unquestionable evidence that some herbicide resistance alleles are associated with pleiotropic effects that result in plant fitness costs. Observed costs are evident from herbicide resistance‐endowing amino acid substitutions in proteins involved in amino acid, fatty acid, auxin and cellulose biosynthesis, as well as enzymes involved in herbicide metabolism. However, these resistance fitness costs are not universal and their expression depends on particular plant alleles and mutations. The findings of this review are discussed within the context of the plant defence trade‐off theory and herbicide resistance evolution. Contents Summary 751 I. Introduction 752 II. Methods for the detection and estimation of herbicide resistance fitness costs 753 III. Fitness costs associated with AHAS target site resistance 756 IV. Fitness costs associated with ACCase target site resistance 757 V. Fitness costs associated with resistance to phenoxy herbicides 758 VI. Arabidopsis thaliana as a model plant to understand pleiotropic effects of herbicide target‐site based resistance alleles 759 VII. Fitness costs associated with herbicide resistance endowed by enhanced rates of herbicide metabolism catalysed by P450 enzymes 760 VIII. Fitness costs associated with glyphosate resistance 760 IX. Discussion 761 X. Conclusion 762 Acknowledgements 763 References 763
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Herbicide cross resistance in weeds
Beckie, H. J., & Tardif, F. J. (2012) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2011.12.018 · Cited by 465
The challenge of herbicide resistance around the world: a current summary
Peterson, M. A., Collavo, A., Ovejero, R., Shivrain, V., & Walsh, M. J. (2018) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4821 · Cited by 382
Lehnhoff, E. A., Keith, B. K., Dyer, W. E., & Menalled, F. D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064478 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Vila‐Aiub, M. M., Neve, P., & Powles, S. B.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-13
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 751-767
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2107159787
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fitness costs associated with evolved herbicide resistance alleles in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03055.x
- The paper
- Vila‐Aiub, M. M., Neve, P., & Powles, S. B. (2009). Fitness costs associated with evolved herbicide resistance alleles in plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03055.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.