Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,022

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biological stoichiometry of plant production: metabolism, scaling and ecological response to global change

Open access
Elser, J. J., Fagan, W. F., Kerkhoff, A. J., Swenson, N. G., Enquist, B. J.·2010·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Biological stoichiometry theory considers the balance of multiple chemical elements in living systems, whereas metabolic scaling theory considers how size affects metabolic properties from cells to ecosystems. We review recent developments integrating biological stoichiometry and metabolic scaling theories in the context of plant ecology and global change. Although vascular plants exhibit wide variation in foliar carbon : nitrogen : phosphorus ratios, they exhibit a higher degree of ‘stoichiometric homeostasis’ than previously appreciated. Thus, terrestrial carbon : nitrogen : phosphorus stoichiometry will reflect the effects of adjustment to local growth conditions as well as species’ replacements. Plant stoichiometry exhibits size scaling, as foliar nutrient concentration decreases with increasing plant size, especially for phosphorus. Thus, small plants have lower nitrogen : phosphorus ratios. Furthermore, foliar nutrient concentration is reflected in other tissues (root, reproductive, support), permitting the development of empirical models of production that scale from tissue to whole‐plant levels. Plant stoichiometry exhibits large‐scale macroecological patterns, including stronger latitudinal trends and environmental correlations for phosphorus concentration (relative to nitrogen) and a positive correlation between nutrient concentrations and geographic range size. Given this emerging knowledge of how plant nutrients respond to environmental variables and are connected to size, the effects of global change factors (such as carbon dioxide, temperature, nitrogen deposition) can be better understood. Contents Summary 593 I. Introduction 594 II. Variation in plant C : N : ratios: how much and what are the sources? 595 III. The growth rate hypothesis in terrestrial plants and the scaling of whole‐plant N : P stoichiometry and production 597 IV. Scaling from tissues to whole plants 599 V. Applications: large‐scale patterns and processes associated with plant stoichiometry 601 VI. Global change and plants: a stoichiometric scaling perspective 603 VII. Synthesis and summary 604 Acknowledgements 605 References 605

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03214.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 1,022

Metadata

Authors
Elser, J. J., Fagan, W. F., Kerkhoff, A. J., Swenson, N. G., & Enquist, B. J.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-10
Volume
186
Issue
3
Pages
593-608
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2140280571
Cited by
1,022
References
7
FWCI
37.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological stoichiometry of plant production: metabolism, scaling and ecological response to global change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03214.x
The paper
Elser, J. J., Fagan, W. F., Kerkhoff, A. J., Swenson, N. G., & Enquist, B. J. (2010). Biological stoichiometry of plant production: metabolism, scaling and ecological response to global change. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03214.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.