The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon reserves and canopy defoliation determine the recovery of Scots pine 4 yr after a drought episode
Open accessAbstract
• Severe drought may increase physiological stress on long-lived woody vegetation, occasionally leading to mortality of overstory trees. Little is known about the factors determining tree survival and subsequent recovery after drought. • We used structural equation modeling to analyse the recovery of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) trees 4 yr after an extreme drought episode occurred in 2004-2005 in north-east Spain. Measured variables included the amount of green foliage, carbon reserves in the stem, mistletoe (Viscum album) infection, needle physiological performance and stem radial growth before, during and after the drought event. • The amount of green leaves and the levels of carbon reserves were related to the impact of drought on radial growth, and mutually correlated. However, our most likely path model indicated that current depletion of carbon reserves was a result of reduced photosynthetic tissue. This relationship potentially constitutes a feedback limiting tree recovery. In addition, mistletoe infection reduced leaf nitrogen content, negatively affecting growth. Finally, successive surveys in 2009-2010 showed a direct association between carbon reserves depletion and drought-induced mortality. • Severe drought events may induce long-term physiological disorders associated with canopy defoliation and depletion of carbon reserves, leading to prolonged recovery of surviving individuals and, eventually, to delayed tree death.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Allen, C. D., Macalady, A. K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., McDowell, N., Vennetier, M., Kitzberger, T., Rigling, A., Breshears, D. D., Hogg, E. H. (., et al. (2010) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001 · Cited by 7,763
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
Cited by
Lloret, F., Keeling, E. G., & Sala, A. (2011) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19372.x · Cited by 1,049
Self-citationThe interdependence of mechanisms underlying climate-driven vegetation mortality
McDowell, N. G., Beerling, D. J., Breshears, D. D., Fisher, R. A., Raffa, K. F., & Stitt, M. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.003 · Cited by 1,020
Zang, C., Hartl‐Meier, C., Dittmar, C., Rothe, A., & Menzel, A. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12637 · Cited by 359
Lévesque, M., Saurer, M., Siegwolf, R., Eilmann, B., Brang, P., Bugmann, H., & Rigling, A. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12268 · Cited by 355
Parasitic Weeds: A World Challenge
Parker, C. (2012) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/ws-d-11-00068.1 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Galiano, L., Martínez‐Vilalta, J., & Lloret, F.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-24
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 750-759
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2010443544
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon reserves and canopy defoliation determine the recovery of Scots pine 4 yr after a drought episode. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03628.x
- The paper
- Galiano, L., Martínez‐Vilalta, J., & Lloret, F. (2011). Carbon reserves and canopy defoliation determine the recovery of Scots pine 4 yr after a drought episode. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03628.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.