The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New grass phylogeny resolves deep evolutionary relationships and discovers C4 origins
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Grasses rank among the world’s most ecologically and economically important plants. Repeated evolution of the C 4 syndrome has made photosynthesis highly efficient in many grasses, inspiring intensive efforts to engineer the pathway into C 3 crops. However, comparative biology has been of limited use to this endeavor because of uncertainty in the number and phylogenetic placement of C 4 origins. We built the most comprehensive and robust molecular phylogeny for grasses to date, expanding sampling efforts of a previous working group from 62 to 531 taxa, emphasizing the C 4‐rich PACMAD (Panicoideae, Arundinoideae, Chloridoideae, Micrairoideae, Aristidoideae and Danthonioideae) clade. Our final matrix comprises c. 5700 bp and is > 93% complete. For the first time, we present strong support for relationships among all the major grass lineages. Several new C 4 lineages are identified, and previously inferred origins confirmed. C 3/C 4 evolutionary transitions have been highly asymmetrical, with 22–24 inferred origins of the C 4 pathway and only one potential reversal. Our backbone tree clarifies major outstanding systematic questions and highlights C 3 and C 4 sister taxa for comparative studies. Two lineages have emerged as hotbeds of C 4 evolution. Future work in these lineages will be instrumental in understanding the evolution of this complex trait.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic Inference
Shimodaira, H., & Hasegawa, M. (1999) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026201 · Cited by 4,237
Sanderson, M. J. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.301 · Cited by 1,906
Cited by
Photorespiration and the Evolution of C4Photosynthesis
Sage, R. F., Sage, T. L., & Kocacinar, F. (2012) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105511 · Cited by 759
Soreng, R. J., Peterson, P. M., Romaschenko, K., Davidse, G., Teisher, J. K., Clark, L. G., Barberá, P., Gillespie, L. J., & Zuloaga, F. O. (2017) · Journal of Systematics and Evolution · doi:10.1111/jse.12262 · Cited by 537
Biosynthesis, elicitation and roles of monocot terpenoid phytoalexins
Schmelz, E. A., Huffaker, A., Sims, J. W., Christensen, S. A., Lu, X., Okada, K., & Peters, R. J. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12436 · Cited by 317
Harris, B. J., Clark, J. W., Schrempf, D., Szöllősi, G. J., Donoghue, P. C. J., Hetherington, A. M., & Williams, T. A. (2022) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-022-01885-x · Cited by 187
Whole-genome microsynteny-based phylogeny of angiosperms
Zhao, T., Zwaenepoel, A., Xue, J.-Y., Kao, S.-M., Li, Z., Schranz, M. E., & Van de Peer, Y. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23665-0 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Grass Phylogeny Working Group II
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-11-24
- Volume
- 193
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 304-312
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2240405888
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 36.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New grass phylogeny resolves deep evolutionary relationships and discovers C4 origins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03972.x
- The paper
- Grass Phylogeny Working Group II. (2012). New grass phylogeny resolves deep evolutionary relationships and discovers C4 origins. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03972.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.