Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Silicon nutrition increases grain yield, which, in turn, exerts a feed‐forward stimulation of photosynthetic rates via enhanced mesophyll conductance and alters primary metabolism in rice

Open access
Detmann, Kelly C., Araújo, Wagner L., Martins, Samuel C. V., Sanglard, Lílian M. V. P., Reis, Josimar V., Detmann, Edenio, Rodrigues, Fabrício Á., Nunes‐Nesi, Adriano, Fernie, Alisdair R., DaMatta, Fábio M.·2012·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Silicon (Si) is not considered to be an essential element for higher plants and is believed to have no effect on primary metabolism in unstressed plants. In rice (O ryza sativa), Si nutrition improves grain production; however, no attempt has been made to elucidate the physiological mechanisms underlying such responses. Here, we assessed crop yield and combined advanced gas exchange analysis with carbon isotope labelling and metabolic profiling to measure the effects of Si nutrition on rice photosynthesis, together with the associated metabolic changes, by comparing wild‐type rice with the low‐Si rice mutant lsi1 under unstressed conditions. Si improved the harvest index, paralleling an increase in nitrogen use efficiency. Higher crop yields associated with Si nutrition exerted a feed‐forward effect on photosynthesis which was fundamentally associated with increased mesophyll conductance. By contrast, Si nutrition did not affect photosynthetic gas exchange during the vegetative growth phase or in de‐grained plants. In addition, Si nutrition altered primary metabolism by stimulating amino acid remobilization. Our results indicate a stimulation of the source capacity, coupled with increased sink demand, in Si‐treated plants; therefore, we identify Si nutrition as an important target in attempts to improve the agronomic yield of rice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04299.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Detmann, K. C., Araújo, W. L., Martins, S. C. V., Sanglard, L. M. V. P., Reis, J. V., Detmann, E., Rodrigues, F. Á., Nunes‐Nesi, A., Fernie, A. R., & DaMatta, F. M.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09-19
Volume
196
Issue
3
Pages
752-762
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W1978851087
Cited by
319
References
2
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Silicon nutrition increases grain yield, which, in turn, exerts a feed‐forward stimulation of photosynthetic rates via enhanced mesophyll conductance and alters primary metabolism in rice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04299.x
The paper
Detmann, K. C., Araújo, W. L., Martins, S. C. V., Sanglard, L. M. V. P., Reis, J. V., Detmann, E., Rodrigues, F. Á., Nunes‐Nesi, A., Fernie, A. R., & DaMatta, F. M. (2012). Silicon nutrition increases grain yield, which, in turn, exerts a feed‐forward stimulation of photosynthetic rates via enhanced mesophyll conductance and alters primary metabolism in rice. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04299.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.