Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do early intervention programmes improve cognitive and motor outcomes for preterm infants after discharge? A systematic review

Open access
ORTON, JANE, SPITTLE, ALICIA, DOYLE, LEX, ANDERSON, PETER, BOYD, ROSLYN·2009·Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study was to review the effects of early developmental intervention after discharge from hospital on motor and cognitive development in preterm infants. Method Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi‐RCTs of early developmental intervention programmes for preterm infants in which motor or cognitive outcomes were reported and in which the intervention commenced before or after discharge were included. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies grouped by intervention, age of outcome, and study quality was undertaken. Databases searched (up to January 2009) included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase. Results Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria (2686 patients randomized), but only 11 studies had data suitable for meta‐analysis. Early developmental intervention improved cognitive outcomes at infant age (developmental quotient: standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33–0.52; p<0.001), and at preschool age (IQ: SMD 0.46, 95% CI 0.33–0.59; p<0.001). However, the benefit was not sustained at school age (IQ: SMD 0.02, 95% CI –0.10 to 0.14; p=0.71). Early intervention had little effect on motor outcome at infant or school age, and there was no study reporting motor outcome at preschool age. Interpretation Current evidence suggests that the benefits of developmental intervention postdischarge are restricted to short‐term gains in cognitive outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03414.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
ORTON, J., SPITTLE, A., DOYLE, L., ANDERSON, P., & BOYD, R.
Venue
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10
Volume
51
Issue
11
Pages
851-859
ISSN
  • 0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8749
OpenAlex
W2123477170
Cited by
241
References
3
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do early intervention programmes improve cognitive and motor outcomes for preterm infants after discharge? A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03414.x
The paper
ORTON, J., SPITTLE, A., DOYLE, L., ANDERSON, P., & BOYD, R. (2009). Do early intervention programmes improve cognitive and motor outcomes for preterm infants after discharge? A systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03414.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.