The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Auditory Evoked Potentials to Unpredictable Shifts in Pitch
Abstract
Auditory evoked potentials (EPs) were recorded from subjects presented with a regular series of tone pips at one of three rates (1/sec, 2/sec, or 4/sec). Occasionally one of the pips was 5%, 25%, or 100% (an octave) different in pitch from the repetitive background pips. These “mismatch” tones occurred at random with a mean interval of 12 sec (range 1–24 sec) for all of the repetition rates. This determined an average sequential probability = 0.083, 0.042, 0.021 that a tone would be a mismatch. On different runs, subjects either responded with a button press each time they heard a mismatch or they read a book. The amplitude of a large negative component (N2 at 154 msec) evoked after mismatch tones was unrelated to degree of mismatch but was larger to all the mismatch tones than to the background pip. Instructions to attend did not affect N2. A subsequent positive peak at 277 msec (P3), recorded during reading, did increase in amplitude with increasing mismatch, as did a P3 at 330 msec recorded during responding. Sequential probability had no main effect on N2 or P3. This lack of an effect on P3 suggests that the well‐known influence of stimulus uncertainty on P3 may be determined by the temporal rather than sequential uncertainty of events, or that our range of probabilities was too narrow to obtain the effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Event-Related Brain Potentials in Man
(1978) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-155150-6.x5001-9 · Cited by 954
Giard, M., Perrin, F., Pernier, J., & Bouchet, P. (1990) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb03184.x · Cited by 872
Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials
Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (1985) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(85)90054-1 · Cited by 799
Processing negativity: An evoked-potential reflection.
Näätänen, R. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.605 · Cited by 684
P300 and Tracking Difficulty: Evidence For Multiple Resources in Dual‐Task Performance
Isreal, J. B., Chesney, G. L., Wickens, C. D., & Donchin, E. (1980) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb00146.x · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Ford, J. M., Roth, W. T., & Kopell, B. S.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-39
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W1974802868
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auditory Evoked Potentials to Unpredictable Shifts in Pitch. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb03333.x
- The paper
- Ford, J. M., Roth, W. T., & Kopell, B. S. (1976). Auditory Evoked Potentials to Unpredictable Shifts in Pitch. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb03333.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.