The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human Auditory Attention: The Olivocochlear Bundle May Function as a Peripheral Filter
Abstract
Two experiments examined whether focused attention toward a visual display would alter the sensory transmission properties of the human auditory nerve and brainstem centers to irrelevant auditory tone pips. In the first experiment, 16 subjects either listened to 1000 Hz, 50dB SL tone pips presented binaurally at 10/sec (“Listen”), or mentally counted letters flashed rapidly on a screen (“Look”). The auditory brainstem potentials recorded from the vertex were averaged on‐line in groups of 500 with a 10‐msec sweep and a bandpass of 150–1500 Hz. Results indicated that during the “Look” trials, Wave 5 generated from the inferior colliculus (7.322 msec latency) was significantly reduced in amplitude by 16.4% and increased in latency by 27 μsec. A second experiment with 8 subjects demonstrated that the effects of attention are limited to the auditory nerve component when using 8000 Hz stimuli but are significant for both the auditory nerve and collicular components when a mid‐frequency (2000 Hz) tone pip is used. These results suggest that during concentrated attention toward visual stimuli, irrelevant auditory stimuli may be attenuated at a peripheral level possibly through the action of the efferent olivocochlear bundle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
Cited by
Processing negativity: An evoked-potential reflection.
Näätänen, R. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.605 · Cited by 684
The personality theories of H.J. Eysenck and J.A. Gray: a comparative review
Matthews, G., & Gilliland, K. (1999) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00158-5 · Cited by 504
Electrophysiology of Cognition
Hillyard, S. A., & Picton, T. W. (1987) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010513 · Cited by 391
Multiparametric corticofugal modulation and plasticity in the auditory system
Suga, N., & Ma, X. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1222 · Cited by 379
Eysenck's arousal theory of introversion€xtraversion: A converging measures investigation.
Bullock, W. A., & Gilliland, K. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.113 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Lukas, J. H.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 444-452
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2006689972
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Auditory Attention: The Olivocochlear Bundle May Function as a Peripheral Filter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb00181.x
- The paper
- Lukas, J. H. (1980). Human Auditory Attention: The Olivocochlear Bundle May Function as a Peripheral Filter. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb00181.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.