The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developmental Evidence for Modality‐Dependent P300 Generators: A Normative Study
Abstract
The behavior of the early and late components of the event‐related brain potential (REP) elicited by auditory and visual stimuli was studied in 40 normal females between the ages of 7 and 20. The ERPs were collected using two different tasks (i.e., count and reaction time) in an oddball paradigm. Analysis of the early component (i.e., N1, P2, N2) latencies revealed small but significant decreases with age in the visual modality but no change in the auditory modality. Except for the visual N1, early component amplitudes did not change significantly over this age range. The results showed that auditory and visual P300 latencies, but not amplitudes, changed at significantly different rates over this age range. P300 latencies in the auditory modality showed a relatively abrupt change around age 12, after which P300 latencies changed little and were essentially at their adult levels. The latencies of visual P300s showed a much smaller and more steady decrease with age. Thus visual P300 latencies were shorter than auditory P300s in young children but longer than auditory P300s in older children. Significantly different scalp distributions were found for auditory and visual P300s. Although all P300 activity was maximal over parietal scalp, visual P300s were significantly larger than auditory P300s over central and frontal scalp. The developmental differences, combined with the presence of significantly different scalp topographies for auditory and visual P300s, provide convergent evidence that P300 activity is not independent of the modality of the eliciting stimulus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Johnson, R. (1986) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00649.x · Cited by 960
Self-citationCourchesne, E. (1978) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(78)90291-2 · Cited by 383
Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age
Barrett, G., Neshige, R., & Shibasaki, H. (1987) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(87)90210-0 · Cited by 164
Cited by
On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity
Kok, A. (2001) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577201990559 · Cited by 1,766
Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review
Polich, J., & Kok, A. (1995) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(95)05130-9 · Cited by 1,613
Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations
Herrmann, C. S., & Knight, R. T. (2001) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00027-6 · Cited by 600
Linking Brainwaves to the Brain: An ERP Primer
Key, A. P. F., Dove, G. O., & Maguire, M. J. (2005) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2702_1 · Cited by 398
Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables
Sharma, A., Kraus, N., J. McGee, T., & Nicol, T. G. (1997) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00050-6 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, R.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 651-667
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2108308481
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developmental Evidence for Modality‐Dependent P300 Generators: A Normative Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb03167.x
- The paper
- Johnson, R. (1989). Developmental Evidence for Modality‐Dependent P300 Generators: A Normative Study. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb03167.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.