Cited by 232Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Specificity of regional brain activity in anxiety types during emotion processing

Engels, Anna S., Heller, Wendy, Mohanty, Aprajita, Herrington, John D., Banich, Marie T., Webb, Andrew G., Miller, Gregory A.·2007·Psychophysiology

Abstract

The present study tested the hypothesis that anxious apprehension involves more left- than right-hemisphere activity and that anxious arousal is associated with the opposite pattern. Behavioral and fMRI responses to threat stimuli in an emotional Stroop task were examined in nonpatient groups reporting anxious apprehension, anxious arousal, or neither. Reaction times were longer for negative than for neutral words. As predicted, brain activation distinguished anxious groups in a left inferior frontal region associated with speech production and in a right-hemisphere inferior temporal area. Addressing a second hypothesis about left-frontal involvement in emotion, distinct left frontal regions were associated with anxious apprehension versus processing of positive information. Results support the proposed distinction between the two types of anxiety and resolve an inconsistency about the role of left-frontal activation in emotion and psychopathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00518.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 86 · Cited by 232

Authors
Engels, A. S., Heller, W., Mohanty, A., Herrington, J. D., Banich, M. T., Webb, A. G., & Miller, G. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Gregory A.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-08
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
352-363
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2133132751
Cited by
232
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
19.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH-61358, T32 MH 14257, T32MH019554, T32 MH-19554, T32MH014257, R01MH061358)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA014111, R21 DA 14111)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
anxiety, anxious apprehension, anxious arousal, emotional processing, threat processing, emotional Stroop task, hemispheric lateralization, left hemisphere, right hemisphere, inferior frontal cortex, inferior temporal cortex, brain activation, reaction time
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Arousal, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Color Perception, Discrimination Learning, Dominance, Cerebral, Emotions, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Parietal Lobe, Personality Inventory, Reading, Semantics, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review