Specificity of regional brain activity in anxiety types during emotion processing
Abstract
The present study tested the hypothesis that anxious apprehension involves more left- than right-hemisphere activity and that anxious arousal is associated with the opposite pattern. Behavioral and fMRI responses to threat stimuli in an emotional Stroop task were examined in nonpatient groups reporting anxious apprehension, anxious arousal, or neither. Reaction times were longer for negative than for neutral words. As predicted, brain activation distinguished anxious groups in a left inferior frontal region associated with speech production and in a right-hemisphere inferior temporal area. Addressing a second hypothesis about left-frontal involvement in emotion, distinct left frontal regions were associated with anxious apprehension versus processing of positive information. Results support the proposed distinction between the two types of anxiety and resolve an inconsistency about the role of left-frontal activation in emotion and psychopathology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anxious groups demonstrated hypoactivation of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex compared with nonanxious controls in an emotional Stroop task.
“Anxious groups demonstrated hypoactivation of the rACC compared with nonanxious controls in an emotional Stroop task (Engels et al., 2007).”
From Extension of the Transdiagnostic Model to Focus on Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Treatment (2014) · cites this paper as Engels et al., 2007
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 86 · Cited by 232
- Authors
- Engels, A. S., Heller, W., Mohanty, A., Herrington, J. D., Banich, M. T., Webb, A. G., & Miller, G. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Miller, Gregory A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 352-363
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2133132751
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 19.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH-61358, T32 MH 14257, T32MH019554, T32 MH-19554, T32MH014257, R01MH061358)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA014111, R21 DA 14111)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- anxiety, anxious apprehension, anxious arousal, emotional processing, threat processing, emotional Stroop task, hemispheric lateralization, left hemisphere, right hemisphere, inferior frontal cortex, inferior temporal cortex, brain activation, reaction time
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Arousal, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Color Perception, Discrimination Learning, Dominance, Cerebral, Emotions, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Parietal Lobe, Personality Inventory, Reading, Semantics, Temporal Lobe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review