The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global care chains: a state‐of‐the‐art review and future directions in care transnationalization research
Abstract
This article provides a state‐of‐the‐art review and sympathetic critique of global care chain (GCC) analysis, focusing on its contributions to a sustained research agenda on care transnationalization. GCC analysis has opened up theoretical perspectives and discursive spaces for the sophisticated understandings of globalization processes. Rooted in global network methodology and cognizant of the grounded, textured and embodied nature of care transnationalization, GCC analysis has significantly contributed to better understandings of the socio‐spatial dimensions of diverse forms of care provision worldwide and the identification of transnational political and policy responses. This research agenda is far from exhausted and future research could productively address the following critiques and the conceptual and theoretical issues to which they give rise: first, that GCC research may reinforce care work as women's work; second, that it privileges some aspects of care transnationalization over others; and, third, that GCC analysis renaturalizes the nation‐state. The discussion outlines the implications of these issues for future directions in care transnationalization research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation–state building, migration and the social sciences
Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/1471-0374.00043 · Cited by 3,754
Searching for wages and mothering from Afar: The case of Honduran transnational families
Schmalzbauer, L. (2004) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00095.x · Cited by 366
Plaza, D. (2000) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1007022110306 · Cited by 101
Cited by
Rethinking Care Ethics: On the Promise and Potential of an Intersectional Analysis
HANKIVSKY, O. (2014) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055414000094 · Cited by 287
Caring for the elderly: the embodied labour of migrant care workers in Singapore
HUANG, S., YEOH, B. S. A., & TOYOTA, M. (2012) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00347.x · Cited by 137
The concept of care: Insights, challenges and research avenues in COVID-19 times
Daly, M. (2021) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0958928720973923 · Cited by 95
Marriage Migration Policy in South Korea: Social Investment beyond the Nation State
Kim, G., & Kilkey, M. (2018) · International Migration · doi:10.1111/imig.12350 · Cited by 46
Responsibility, mobility, and power: translocal carework negotiations of Nicaraguan families
Winters, N. (2014) · International Migration Review · doi:10.1111/imre.12062 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- YEATES, N.
- Venue
- Global Networks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-154
- ISSN
- 1470-2266 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0374
- OpenAlex
- W1973409703
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 57.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global care chains: a state‐of‐the‐art review and future directions in care transnationalization research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00344.x
- The paper
- YEATES, N. (2012). Global care chains: a state‐of‐the‐art review and future directions in care transnationalization research. Global Networks. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00344.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.