The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre‐existing physiological disturbances
Abstract
Objective–To compare maternal mortalities attributable to vaginal delivery, elective caesarean section (CS) and intrapartum CS. Design–The number of deaths associated with each method of delivery was ascertained among unselected and among low‐risk women by detailed retrospective review of the casenotes of women who died after delivery. The frequency of each method of delivery throughout the study period was ascertained from the computer database and enhanced by analysis of the case‐notes of unselected groups of women. Setting–The Peninsula Maternity Services (Cape Town) during the years 1975–1986 inclusive. Subjects–A total of 108 maternal deaths arising from 263 075 maternities provided accurate information. The relative frequency of vaginal and abdominal delivery was determined from the computer database. The ratio of elective CS to emergency prepartum CS to intrapartum CS was obtained by review of the first 200 operations in the years 1975, 1977, 1979, 1982 and 1984. Main outcome measures–(i) Mortality rates associated with the different methods of delivery in unselected women and in women who were healthy before surgery: (ii) mortality rates apparently attributable to the method of delivery. Results–The overall relative risk of mortality associated with caesarean section compared with vaginal delivery was 7 decreasing to 5 after the exclusion of women with medical or lifethreatening antenatal complications (eg, haemorrhage, hypertension). The relative risk associated with intrapartum compared with elective sections was 2.3 decreasing to 1.4 after the exclusion of women with medical disorders or life‐threatening complications. The relative risk of maternal mortality which was apparently attributable to intrapartum compared with elective sections was 1 .7. However, the 95% confidence intervals of these values, even from this large data‐set, are wide. Nevertheless, these rates arc in broad agreement with an approximation derived from the British confidential enquiries into maternal deaths. Conclusion–The attributable relative mortalities of caesarean section compared with vaginal delivery and of intrapartum compared with elective caesarean section are lower than the overall relative mortalities of these modes of delivery and are approximately 5:1 and 1.5:1 respectively. These data are crucially important in the decision to recommend elective caesarean section compared with trial of labour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study
Hansen, A. K., Wisborg, K., Uldbjerg, N., & Henriksen, T. B. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39405.539282.be · Cited by 586
Postpartum Maternal Mortality and Cesarean Delivery
Deneux-Tharaux, C., Carmona, E., Bouvier-Colle, M.-H., & Bréart, G. (2006) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000233154.62729.24 · Cited by 434
Maternal mortality in the United States
Lang, C. T., & King, J. C. (2008) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.10.004 · Cited by 404
Elective Primary Cesarean Delivery
Minkoff, H., & Chervenak, F. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb022734 · Cited by 305
Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term
Lavender, T., Hofmeyr, G. J., Neilson, J. P., Kingdon, C., & Gyte, G. M. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004660.pub3 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- LILFORD, R. J., VAN COEVERDEN DE GROOT, H. A., MOORE, P. J., & BINGHAM, P.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 883-892
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2065879933
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre‐existing physiological disturbances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02442.x
- The paper
- LILFORD, R. J., VAN COEVERDEN DE GROOT, H. A., MOORE, P. J., & BINGHAM, P. (1990). The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre‐existing physiological disturbances. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02442.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.