Cited by 67Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Effective destruction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 at 100°C using the Semm cold coagulator: 14 years experience

GORDON, HELEN K., DUNCAN, IAN D.·1991·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Summary. A total of 1628 women with CIN 3 treated with the Semm cold coagulator between 1975 and 1989 was followed primarily by cytology. The standard suitability criteria for ablation were adhered to except that patients were treated at their first visit when the colposcopist expected that the diagnosis would be no worse than CIN 3. Overall 97% of the women were treated at their first visit. In 30 women (2%) the histology was glandular or worse than expected, but 22 of these showed no persistent cervical disease subsequently. Follow‐up was achieved for 87% at 10 years. In actuarial terms the primary success rate was 95% at 1 year and 92% at 5 years, it was similar for all age groups. Repeat coldcoagulation for persistent/recurrent CIN 3 was less successful and is not advised. The outcome for 226 pregnancies established after treatment is known. The rates for miscarriage, preterm or operative delivery were not increased. Cold‐coagulation of CIN 3 at 100°C as performed by us is as effective as any other treatment and calls into question the need for more expensive practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb10304.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An earlier cohort study of women treated by thermal ablation between 1975 and 1989 reported outcomes of 226 pregnancies without detecting an increase in miscarriage rates compared to expected figures, but did not include a control group.

    “On the contrary, an earlier cohort study of women treated by TA between 1975 and 1989 reported the outcomes of 226 pregnancies without detecting an increase in miscarriage rates compared to expected figures [28]. However, the study did not include a control group.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GORDON, H. K., & DUNCAN, I. D.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
GORDON, HELEN K.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-01
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
14-20
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2053899202
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, cold coagulation, treatment outcomes, repeat ablation, miscarriage, preterm birth, instrumental delivery, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Carcinoma in Situ, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Electrocoagulation, Female, Fertility, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Neoplasm Staging, Parity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review