The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fetal umbilical artery velocity waveforms and subsequent neonatal outcome
Abstract
Summary. Flow velocity waveforms (FVWs) from the fetal umbilical artery were recorded from 2178 pregnant women over a 6‐year period. All of them had an obstetric factor indicating increased risk of fetal compromise. A total of 6749 studies was recorded. The systolic diastolic (AB) ratio was measured and classified as normal (<95th centile), elevated (95–99th centile), high (>99th centile) or extreme (absent diastolic flow). The results of these studies have been related to subsequent fetal and neonatal outcome. An abnormal umbilical artery FVW was associated with shorter gestation and infants with lower birthweight, shorter length and lower ponderal index. There was a highly significant association between an abnormal FVW and the birth of an infant small for gestational age. The significance of the association increased with the increased abnormality of the umbilical artery FVW and this was independent of gestational age. Preterm infants associated with high or extreme AB ratios spent twice as long in the neonatal nursery than those with normal AB ratios. Analysis of 794 pregnancies studies serially indicated that an abnormal FVW in which the AB ratio was increasing, in contrast to a decreasing AB ratio, predicted a poor outcome for both size at birth and duration of neonatal intensive care. We conclude that in high risk pregnancy Doppler umbilical artery FVW studies predict the most compromised fetuses in terms of growth retardation and requirements for neonatal intensive care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery
Karsdorp, V. H. M., van Vugt, J. M. G., van Geijn, H. P., Kostense, P. J., Arduim, D., Montenegro, N., & Todros, T. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90457-x · Cited by 445
Chaiworapongsa, T., Romero, R., Kim, Y. M., Kim, G. J., Kim, M. R., Espinoza, J., Bujold, E., Gonçalves, L., Gomez, R., Edwin, S., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767050400028816 · Cited by 359
Baschat, A. A., & Weiner, C. P. (2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70505-9 · Cited by 151
Figueras, F., Eixarch, E., Meler, E., Iraola, A., Figueras, J., Puerto, B., & Gratacos, E. (2008) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.02.016 · Cited by 121
McCowan, L. M. E., Harding, J. E., Roberts, A. B., Barker, S. E., Ford, C., & Stewart, A. W. (2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70494-7 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- TRUDINGER, B. J., COOK, C. M., GILES, W. B., NG, S., FONG, E., CONNELLY, A., & WILCOX, W.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 378-384
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W1967961326
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fetal umbilical artery velocity waveforms and subsequent neonatal outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13428.x
- The paper
- TRUDINGER, B. J., COOK, C. M., GILES, W. B., NG, S., FONG, E., CONNELLY, A., & WILCOX, W. (1991). Fetal umbilical artery velocity waveforms and subsequent neonatal outcome. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13428.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.