Length and variation in the menstrual cycle--a cross-sectional study from a Danish county
Abstract
Objective To investigate the current epidemiology of menstrual patters among women of fertile age. Design Cross‐sectional postal questionnaire study. Setting County of Copenhagen, Denmark. Subjects 3743 women, aged 15–14, selected at random from a Danish county, who were asked to provide information on menstrual pattern during the preceding year, 1981. The response rate was 78%. Information from non‐responders was obtained via telephone interviews. Results In women with regular menstrual cycles, the 5th–95th centile range of usual cycle length decreased from 23–35 days in the 15–19 years age group to 23–30 days in the 40–44 years age group. Only 0.5% of regular menstruating women had a usual cycle length of <21 days and 0.9% had a usual cycle length of >35 days. At least one cycle length of <21 days was experienced by 18.6%, whereas 29.5% had at least one cycle of >35 days. Menstrual cycle variation of >14 days was present in 29.3% of all women. Cycle length variation of > 14 days was 2.7 times more frequent in women from lower social groups (controlled by age). Conclusion The study confirmed the normally used definitions of polymenorrhoea (cycle length <21 days) and oligomenorrhoea (cycle length between 36 and 90 days), as these very short or long menstrual cycle lengths were very seldom recorded for a longer period. However, the high frequency in a normal population of large menstrual cycle length variation challenges the view that an intra‐individual variation of >5 days should be regarded as a sign of disease in the woman.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cycle characteristics described in this study are consistent with previous findings on research cohorts.
“The cycle characteristics described in this study are consistent with previous findings on research cohorts (Chiazze et al. 1968; Vollman 1977; Münster et al. 1992; Johnson et al. 2009; 2018), indicating that previous clinical findings are still reflective of cycle characteristics of today’s population of women who are seeking to conceive.”
From Real-life insights on menstrual cycles and ovulation using big data (2020) · cites this paper as Münster et al. 1992
Cites
The length and variability of the human menstrual cycle
Chiazze, L. (1968) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1968.03140060001001 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variability in the phases of the menstrual cycle
Fehring, R. J., Schneider, M., & Raviele, K. (2006) · Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00051.x · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Real-life insights on menstrual cycles and ovulation using big data
Soumpasis, I., Grace, B., & Johnson, S. (2020) · Human Reproduction Open · doi:10.1093/hropen/hoaa011 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“research cohorts (Chiazze et al. 1968; Vollman 1977; Münster et al. 1992; Johnson et al. 2009; 2018), indicating that previous clinical findings are still reflective of cycle characteristics of today’s population”
BackgroundVermeersch, H., T'Sjoen, G., Kaufman, J.-M., & Vincke, J. (2008) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.03.016 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Haimov-Kochman, R., & Berger, I. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00191 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Zhang, C. Y., Li, H., Zhang, S., Suharwardy, S., Chaturvedi, U., Fischer-Colbrie, T., Maratta, L. A., Onnela, J.-P., Coull, B. A., Hauser, R., et al. (2023) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.029 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Vermeersch, H., T’Sjoen, G., Kaufman, J.-M., & Vincke, J. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.034 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Menstruation and Menstrual Disorders
HARLOW, S. D. (2000) · Women and Health · doi:10.1016/b978-012288145-9/50012-7 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Nocturnal Light Effects on Menstrual Cycle Length
Rex, K. M., Kripke, D. F., Cole, R. J., & Klauber, M. R. (1997) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.1997.3.387 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- MÜNSTER, K., SCHMIDT, L., & HELM, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- MÜNSTER, KIRSTINE
- ORCID
- SCHMIDT, LONE
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 422-429
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2062503593
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Keywords
- menstrual cycle length, menstrual cycle variation, oligomenorrhea, menstrual pattern, social class, age differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Menstruation, Menstruation Disturbances, Social Class
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review