The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychosexual dysfunction in women with gynaecological cancer following radical pelvic surgery
Abstract
Objective To assess the prevalence and severity of psychosexual dysfunction in women treated for cancer of the cervix and vulva by radical vulvectomy, Wertheim's hysterectomy and pelvic exenteration; and to identify the risk factors for sexual morbidity and ways in which it might be reduced. Design Retrospective study of patients by questionnaire and semistructured interview, 6 months to 5 years following surgery. Setting Gynaecology–Oncology Unit of a general hospital. Patients 105 English speaking women with gynaecological cancer. Results 90% of the women in relationships had been sexually active prior to surgery. Of this group, 24% had no sexual difficulties post‐operatively; 66% of the latter still had problems more than 6 months later, and 15% of the latter never resumed intercourse (excluding those with a colpectomy). 82% of those aged less than 50 years who had had radiotherapy suffered sexual dysfunction. Lack of desire was the commonest problem, and half the women felt that their sexual relationship had deteriorated, yet only 16% felt that their marriage had worsened. Younger women were more likely to attribute personal and marital distress to their sexual problems. More information on sexual matters would have been liked by 28% of the women. Conclusions Sexual dysfunction is common following radical pelvic surgery and tends to remain a chronic problem. As well as organic causes there is a strong psychogenie element brought about by loss of fertility, disfigurement, depression and anxiety about one's desirability as a sexual partner. The presence of a stable relationship before the diagnosis of cancer helps women cope better, and young single women are a very vulnerable group. Patients want more information on sexual matters and the provision of sexual counselling may improve outcome in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rutten, L. J. F., Arora, N. K., Bakos, A. D., Aziz, N., & Rowland, J. (2005) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.06.006 · Cited by 910
Vaginal Changes and Sexuality in Women with a History of Cervical Cancer
Bergmark, K., Åvall-Lundqvist, E., Dickman, P. W., Henningsohn, L., & Steineck, G. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199905063401802 · Cited by 665
A systematic review of sexual concerns reported by gynecological cancer survivors
Abbott-Anderson, K., & Kwekkeboom, K. L. (2012) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.030 · Cited by 263
The impact of cervical cancer on quality of life—The components and means for management
Herzog, T. J., & Wright, J. D. (2007) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.09.019 · Cited by 119
Effects of cancer on the sexuality and fertility of women
Lamb, M. A. (1995) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/s0749-2081(05)80019-1 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Corney, R. H., Crowther, M. E., Everett, H., Howells, A., & Shepherd, J. H.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-78
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2037383614
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychosexual dysfunction in women with gynaecological cancer following radical pelvic surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12955.x
- The paper
- Corney, R. H., Crowther, M. E., Everett, H., Howells, A., & Shepherd, J. H. (1993). Psychosexual dysfunction in women with gynaecological cancer following radical pelvic surgery. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12955.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.