Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Psychosexual dysfunction in women with gynaecological cancer following radical pelvic surgery

Corney, R. H., Crowther, M. E., Everett, H., Howells, A., Shepherd, J. H.·1993·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective To assess the prevalence and severity of psychosexual dysfunction in women treated for cancer of the cervix and vulva by radical vulvectomy, Wertheim's hysterectomy and pelvic exenteration; and to identify the risk factors for sexual morbidity and ways in which it might be reduced. Design Retrospective study of patients by questionnaire and semistructured interview, 6 months to 5 years following surgery. Setting Gynaecology–Oncology Unit of a general hospital. Patients 105 English speaking women with gynaecological cancer. Results 90% of the women in relationships had been sexually active prior to surgery. Of this group, 24% had no sexual difficulties post‐operatively; 66% of the latter still had problems more than 6 months later, and 15% of the latter never resumed intercourse (excluding those with a colpectomy). 82% of those aged less than 50 years who had had radiotherapy suffered sexual dysfunction. Lack of desire was the commonest problem, and half the women felt that their sexual relationship had deteriorated, yet only 16% felt that their marriage had worsened. Younger women were more likely to attribute personal and marital distress to their sexual problems. More information on sexual matters would have been liked by 28% of the women. Conclusions Sexual dysfunction is common following radical pelvic surgery and tends to remain a chronic problem. As well as organic causes there is a strong psychogenie element brought about by loss of fertility, disfigurement, depression and anxiety about one's desirability as a sexual partner. The presence of a stable relationship before the diagnosis of cancer helps women cope better, and young single women are a very vulnerable group. Patients want more information on sexual matters and the provision of sexual counselling may improve outcome in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12955.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Corney, R. H., Crowther, M. E., Everett, H., Howells, A., & Shepherd, J. H.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-01
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
73-78
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2037383614
Cited by
176
References
0
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychosexual dysfunction in women with gynaecological cancer following radical pelvic surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12955.x
The paper
Corney, R. H., Crowther, M. E., Everett, H., Howells, A., & Shepherd, J. H. (1993). Psychosexual dysfunction in women with gynaecological cancer following radical pelvic surgery. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12955.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.