Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bowel dysfunction: a pathogenic factor in uterovaginal prolapse and urinary stress incontinence

Spence‐Jones, Clive, Kamm, Michael A., Henry, Michael M., Hudson, C. N.·1994·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective To investigate the aetiological importance of bowel dysfunction in patients with uterovaginal prolapse and urinary stress incontinence. Design Observational study using a questionnaire about obstetric history and bowel function, and anorectal physiological studies. Setting Physiology unit and gynaecological outpatients departments of two teaching hospitals. Subjects Twenty‐three women with uterovaginal prolapse (mean age 57 years), 23 women with urinary stress incontinence (mean age 52 years) and 27 control women (mean age 52 years). Results There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in their parity, age or birthweight of their children. However, straining at stool as a young adult prior to the development of urogynaecological symptoms was significantly more common in women with uterovaginal prolapse (61%vs 4%, P < 0.001) and women with urinary stress incontinence (30%vs 4%, P < 0.05), compared with controls. A bowel frequency of less than twice per week as a young adult was also more common in women with uterovaginal prolapse than in control women (48%vs 8%, P < 0.001). At the time of consultation, 95% of the women with uterovaginal prolapse were constipated, compared with only 11% of control women. Many of these women also needed to digitate to achieve rectal evacuation. Compared with controls, women with uterovaginal prolapse had a prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (1.9 ms vs 2.2 ms, respectively, P= 0.003). Women with stress incontinence of urine had a normal pudendal nerve latency (2.0 ms). Other tests of anorectal function were normal. Conclusions Constipation, in addition to obstetric history, appears to be an important factor in the pathogenesis of uterovaginal prolapse.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13081.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Spence‐Jones, C., Kamm, M. A., Henry, M. M., & Hudson, C. N.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-02
Volume
101
Issue
2
Pages
147-152
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W1971578291
Cited by
247
References
0
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bowel dysfunction: a pathogenic factor in uterovaginal prolapse and urinary stress incontinence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13081.x
The paper
Spence‐Jones, C., Kamm, M. A., Henry, M. M., & Hudson, C. N. (1994). Bowel dysfunction: a pathogenic factor in uterovaginal prolapse and urinary stress incontinence. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13081.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.