The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcome of very preterm small for gestational age infants: the first nine years of life
Abstract
Objective To determine the influence of intrauterine growth retardation of preterm infants on mortality and cognitive development. Design A nationwide study cohort of very preterm and/or small for gestational age infants (< 32 weeks and/or < 1500 g) born alive in 1983 in the Netherlands. Assessment on neuromotor and cognitive development at five years, and a parental questionnaire on school performance at nine years. Cognitive outcome is defined as handicap for mental and speech‐language development, and need for special education. Sample 134 small for gestational age infants (< 10th centile) and 410 appropriate for gestational age infants (between 25th and 75th centile) of all infants between 25 and 32 weeks of gestational age were identified; infants with congenital malformations and not of Caucasian race were excluded. Main outcome measures Neonatal mortality, in‐hospital and five years mortality; Cognitive outcome at five years; School performance at nine years. Results The mortality risk for small for gestational age compared with appropriate for gestational age infants was significantly higher, after adjustment for gestational age, sex, multiple pregnancy and mode of delivery (OR 2–56,95% CI 1.26–5.26). Small for gestational age infants showed more often gross motor and minor neurological dysfunction, but less cerebral palsy than appropriate for gestational age infants. Cognitive outcome at five years in small for gestational age infants was significantly worse than appropriate for gestational age infants stratified for mode of delivery OR 2.44 (95% CI 1.05–5.55). At nine years of age significantly more small for gestational age infants (1 6.4%) needed special education than appropriate for gestational age infants (11.9%). Conclusion Intrauterine growth retardation increases the risk of mortality and of cognitive disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grote, N. K., Bridge, J. A., Gavin, A. R., Melville, J. L., Iyengar, S., & Katon, W. J. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.111 · Cited by 1,882
The consequences of fetal growth restriction on brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome
Miller, S. L., Huppi, P. S., & Mallard, C. (2016) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp271402 · Cited by 620
Cerebellum of the Premature Infant: Rapidly Developing, Vulnerable, Clinically Important
Volpe, J. J. (2009) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/0883073809338067 · Cited by 503
Leitner, Y., Fattal-Valevski, A., Geva, R., Eshel, R., Toledano-Alhadef, H., Rotstein, M., Bassan, H., Radianu, B., Bitchonsky, O., Jaffa, A. J., et al. (2007) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/0883073807302605 · Cited by 332
Rethinking stress in parents of preterm infants: a meta-analysis
Schappin, R., Wijnroks, L., Uniken Venema, M. M. A. T., & Jongmans, M. J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054992 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Kok, J. H., Lya den Ouden, A., Verloove‐Vanhorick, S. P., & Brand, R.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 162-168
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2002716720
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome of very preterm small for gestational age infants: the first nine years of life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10046.x
- The paper
- Kok, J. H., Lya den Ouden, A., Verloove‐Vanhorick, S. P., & Brand, R. (1998). Outcome of very preterm small for gestational age infants: the first nine years of life. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10046.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.