The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery
Open accessAbstract
Objective To determine risk factors for the occurrence of third degree perineal tears during vaginal delivery. Design A population‐based observational study. Population All 284,783 vaginal deliveries in 1994 and 1995 recorded in the Dutch National Obstetric Database were included in the study. Methods Third degree perineal rupture was defined as any rupture involving the anal sphincter muscles. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess risk factors. Main outcome measures An overall rate of third degree perineal ruptures of 1.94% was found. High fetal birthweight, long duration of the second stage of delivery and primiparity were associated with an elevated risk of anal sphincter damage. Mediolateral episiotomy appeared to protect strongly against damage to the anal sphincter complex during delivery (OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.20–0.23). All types of assisted vaginal delivery were associated with third degree perineal ruptures, with forceps delivery (OR: 3.33, 95%‐CI: 2.97–3.74) carrying the largest risk of all assisted vaginal deliveries. Use of forceps combined with other types of assisted vaginal delivery appeared to increase the risk even further. Conclusions Mediolateral episiotomy protects strongly against the occurrence of third degree perineal ruptures and may thus serve as a primary method of prevention of faecal incontinence. Forceps delivery is a stronger risk factor for third degree perineal tears than vacuum extraction. If the obstetric situation permits use of either instrument, the vacuum extractor should be the instrument of choice with respect to the prevention of faecal incontinence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gurol‐Urganci, I., Cromwell, D., Edozien, L., Mahmood, T., Adams, E., Richmond, D., Templeton, A., & van der Meulen, J. (2013) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12363 · Cited by 391
Fenner, D. E., Genberg, B., Brahma, P., Marek, L., & DeLancey, J. O. L. (2003) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.030 · Cited by 332
Bergholt, T., Østberg, B., Legarth, J., & Weber, T. (2004) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.0312.x · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- de Leeuw, J. W., Struijk, P. C., Vierhout, M. E., & Wallenburg, H. C. S.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 383-387
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2112720109
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00090.x
- The paper
- de Leeuw, J. W., Struijk, P. C., Vierhout, M. E., & Wallenburg, H. C. S. (2001). Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00090.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.