Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Is pre‐eclampsia more than one disease?

Vatten, Lars J., Skjærven, Rolv·2004·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objectives The clinical characteristics of pre‐eclampsia (gestational hypertension and proteinuria) may represent separate pathogenetic conditions. Pre‐eclampsia accompanied by restricted fetal growth may originate from abnormal implantation, and appropriate or high birthweights may indicate a mixture of conditions, ranging from mild pre‐eclampsia with modest placental involvement to hypertensive conditions without placental disease. Design Prospective, observational study. Setting General population. Population We used data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, a population‐based registry that has recorded births since 1967. For this study, we used information on length of gestation and presence of pre‐eclampsia among 1,679,205 singletons born between 1967 and 1998. Pre‐eclampsia was diagnosed in 44,220 (2.6%) pregnancies. Methods We studied the risk of pre‐eclampsia in relation to standardised measures (z scores) of birthweight, adjusted for length of gestation, and stratified by term and preterm delivery. We also explored whether gestational diabetes was more prevalent in conjunction with preterm than term pre‐eclampsia. Main outcome measures Pre‐eclampsia diagnosed at term or preterm. Results For pre‐eclampsia diagnosed around term, there was a U‐shaped association with birthweight. Compared with appropriate birthweights for gestation, the risk of term pre‐eclampsia was more than fourfold higher (relative risk [RR] 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3 to 4.7) if the baby's birthweight was lower than two standard deviations under the mean. For birthweights three standard deviations or higher than the mean, pre‐eclampsia was more than twice as likely (RR 2.6, 95% CI 2.2–2.9). In contrast, the risk of preterm pre‐eclampsia displayed an L‐shaped association with birthweight. Low birthweight (less than −2 standard deviations) was associated with greatly increased risk (RR 9.9, 95% CI 9.1–10.9), but for high birthweights (≥3 standard deviations), there was no association with the risk of preterm pre‐eclampsia (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.7–2.1). The prevalence of gestational diabetes was three times (prevalence ratio 3.3, 95% CI 2.6–3.6) higher in preterm than term pre‐eclampsia. Conclusion Whereas pre‐eclampsia with preterm delivery associated with low birthweight may be caused by underlying placental abnormality, pre‐eclampsia delivered at term may represent a mixture of conditions, ranging from mild pre‐eclampsia with moderate placental affection to hypertensive conditions in pregnancy without placental dysfunction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00071.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Vatten, L. J., & Skjærven, R.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-04
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
298-302
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W1969469648
Cited by
262
References
0
FWCI
13.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is pre‐eclampsia more than one disease? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00071.x
The paper
Vatten, L. J., & Skjærven, R. (2004). Is pre‐eclampsia more than one disease? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00071.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.