The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
von Willebrand disease in women with menorrhagia: a systematic review
Abstract
Objective To determine the prevalence of von Willebrand disease in women presenting with menorrhagia. Design Systematic review of studies evaluating the prevalence of von Willebrand disease in women with menorrhagia. Setting Hospital outpatient clinics (mainly gynaecological) and population surveys. Population Women presenting with menorrhagia. Methods Relevant studies were extracted from MEDLINE search, bibliographies of identified articles and published proceedings of meetings and conferences. Main outcome measures Number of women with von Willebrand disease. Results Eleven studies were included, totalling 988 women with menorrhagia. One hundred and thirty‐one women were diagnosed to have von Willebrand disease with prevalences in individual studies ranging from 5% to 24%. The overall prevalence was 13% (95% CI 11–15.6%). The prevalence was higher in the European studies—18% (95% CI 15–23%) compared with that in North American studies—10% (95% CI 7.5–13%). This difference (P= 0.007) is likely to be the result of differences in the studies, which include method of recruitment of study population, method of assessing menstrual blood loss ethnic composition of study population, criteria for diagnosis and use of race‐ and ABO blood group‐specific values for von Willebrand factor. Conclusions The prevalence of von Willebrand disease is increased in women with menorrhagia and is the underlying cause in a small but significant group of women with menorrhagia across the world. Testing for this disorder should be considered when investigating women with menorrhagia, especially those of Caucasian origin, those with no obvious pelvic pathology or with additional bleeding symptoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart
HIGHAM, J. M., O'BRIEN, P. M. S., & SHAW, R. W. (1990) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16249.x · Cited by 1,116
Cited by
The FIGO classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years
Munro, M. G., Critchley, H. O. D., & Fraser, I. S. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.079 · Cited by 409
The European Hematology Association Roadmap for European Hematology Research: a consensus document
Engert, A., Balduini, C., Brand, A., Coiffier, B., Cordonnier, C., Dohner, H., de Wit, T. D., Eichinger, S., Fibbe, W., Green, T., et al. (2016) · Haematologica · doi:10.3324/haematol.2015.136739 · Cited by 81
“A systematic review of literature showed a 13% prevalence of von Willebrand disease in women with menorrhagia, with a higher prevalence of 18% in the European population.(269)”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Shankar, M., Lee, C. A., Sabin, C. A., Economides, D. L., & Kadir, R. A.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04-26
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 734-740
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2028949333
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: von Willebrand disease in women with menorrhagia: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00176.x
- The paper
- Shankar, M., Lee, C. A., Sabin, C. A., Economides, D. L., & Kadir, R. A. (2004). von Willebrand disease in women with menorrhagia: a systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00176.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.