The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maternal medicine: Drug prescription patterns before, during and after pregnancy for chronic, occasional and pregnancy‐related drugs in the Netherlands
Open accessAbstract
Objective To compare the prescription of drugs in women over a period from 2 years before until 3 months after pregnancy, regarding the type of drugs used and the fetal risk. Design A cohort study based on pharmacy records of women giving birth to a child between 1994 and 2003. Setting The study was performed with data from the InterAction database, containing prescription‐drug‐dispensing data from community pharmacies. Population The study population included 5412 women for whom complete pharmacy records were available. Methods Drugs were classified into three categories: (1) drugs for chronic conditions, (2) drugs for occasional use and (3) drugs for pregnancy‐related symptoms and also classified according to the Australian classification system. Main outcome measures The prescription rate was calculated as the number of women per 100 women who received one or more prescriptions for a given drug within a specified time period. Results About 79.1% of the women received at least one prescription during pregnancy. The prescription rate for most drugs for chronic diseases and for occasional use decreased during pregnancy, whereas, as expected, the prescription rate for pregnancy‐related drugs increased. During the first trimester of pregnancy, 1.7% of all drugs prescribed for chronic conditions and 2.3% of the occasional drugs were classified as harmful. Conclusions The increase in prescription rate during pregnancy is caused by an increase in prescription rate of drugs for pregnancy‐related symptoms. The prescription of harmful drugs is more commonly associated with drugs for occasional use rather than with drugs for chronic conditions. Therefore, a more cautious prescribing of drugs to healthy women in the fertile age is necessary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pregnancy-Associated Changes in Pharmacokinetics: A Systematic Review
Pariente, G., Leibson, T., Carls, A., Adams-Webber, T., Ito, S., & Koren, G. (2016) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002160 · Cited by 336
Prescription drug use during pregnancy in developed countries: a systematic review
Daw, J. R., Hanley, G. E., Greyson, D. L., & Morgan, S. G. (2011) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.2184 · Cited by 273
Daud, A. N. A., Bergman, J. E. H., Bakker, M. K., Wang, H., Kerstjens-Frederikse, W. S., de Walle, H. E. K., Groen, H., Bos, J. H. J., Hak, E., & Wilffert, B. (2015) · Drug Safety · doi:10.1007/s40264-015-0299-3 · Cited by 46
Self-citation(2013) · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakker, M., Jentink, J., Vroom, F., Van Den Berg, P., De Walle, H., & De Jong‐Van Den Berg, L.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-24
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 559-568
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W1550429477
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal medicine: Drug prescription patterns before, during and after pregnancy for chronic, occasional and pregnancy‐related drugs in the Netherlands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00927.x
- The paper
- Bakker, M., Jentink, J., Vroom, F., Van Den Berg, P., De Walle, H., & De Jong‐Van Den Berg, L. (2006). Maternal medicine: Drug prescription patterns before, during and after pregnancy for chronic, occasional and pregnancy‐related drugs in the Netherlands. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00927.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.