Cited by 165Obesity and Health PracticesGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Obesity in pregnancy: a study of the impact of maternal obesity on NHS maternity services

Open access
Heslehurst, N, Lang, R, Rankin, J, Wilkinson, JR, Summerbell, CD·2007·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective To gain a detailed understanding of healthcare professionals’ perceptions of the impact that caring for obese pregnant women has on maternity services. Design Qualitative interview study using purposeful sampling and face‐to‐face interviews. Setting Sixteen maternity units in NHS Trusts in the North East Government Office Region of England, UK. Sample Thirty‐three maternity and obstetric healthcare professionals with personal experience of managing the care of obese pregnant women. Methods Semi‐structured interviews with healthcare professionals representing each maternity unit in the region. Transcripts were analysed using systematic content analysis. Main outcome measures Views on the impact maternal obesity has on maternity services, the facilities required to care for obese mothers in pregnancy, and existing services directed towards maternal obesity. Results Five dominant themes relating to service delivery emerged; booking appointments, equipment, care requirements, complications and restrictions, and current and future management of care. Many of the issues identified were associated with managing the care of obese women in pregnancy safely, resources and cost issues to be able to do this, multidisciplinary care requirements because of coexisting morbidities when the mother is obese, and restricted care options and patient choice. Conclusions Healthcare professionals in the North East of England feel that maternal obesity has a major impact on services and resource, on the health of both the mother and child, and on the psychological wellbeing of the mother.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01230.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heslehurst, N., Lang, R., Rankin, J., Wilkinson, Jr., & Summerbell, C.
Affiliations
  • Teesside University (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Heslehurst, N
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-25
Volume
114
Issue
3
Pages
334-342
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2170460207
Cited by
165
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
25.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
maternal obesity, obstetric care, healthcare professionals' perceptions, obstetric care delivery, multidisciplinary care, maternal morbidity, perinatal outcomes, healthcare resource allocation, patient choice
MeSH terms
Appointments and Schedules, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Equipment and Supplies, Female, Forecasting, United Kingdom, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, State Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review