The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Caesarean scar pregnancy
Abstract
Caesarean scar pregnancy is one of the rarest forms of ectopic pregnancy. Little is known about its incidence and natural history. With increasing incidence of caesarean section worldwide, more and more cases are diagnosed and reported. Transvaginal ultrasound and colour flow Doppler provides a high diagnostic accuracy with very few false positives. A delay in diagnosis and/or treatment can lead to uterine rupture, major haemorrhage, hysterectomy and serious maternal morbidity. Early diagnosis can offer treatment options of avoiding uterine rupture and haemorrhage, thus preserving the uterus and future fertility. Management plan should be individually tailored. Available data suggest that termination of pregnancy is the treatment of choice in the first trimester soon after the diagnosis. Expectant treatment has a poor prognosis because of risk of rupture. There are no reliable scientific data on the risk of recurrence of the condition in future pregnancy, role of the interval between the previous caesarean delivery and occurrence of caesarean scar pregnancy, and effect of caesarean wound closure technique on caesarean scar pregnancy. In this article, we aim to find the demography, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, most appropriate methods of diagnosis and management, with their implications in clinical practice for this condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: A metaanalysis
Ananth, C. V., Smulian, J. C., & Vintzileos, A. M. (1997) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70017-6 · Cited by 361
Cited by
Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology
Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., Monteagudo, A., Cali, G., Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J. M., Maymon, R., Arslan, A. A., Patil, N., Popiolek, D., & Mittal, K. R. (2014) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.13282 · Cited by 267
Jurkovic, D., Knez, J., Appiah, A., Farahani, L., Mavrelos, D., & Ross, J. A. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.15857 · Cited by 158
Zosmer, N., Fuller, J., Shaikh, H., Johns, J., & Ross, J. A. (2015) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.14775 · Cited by 147
Individual decisions in placenta increta and percreta: a case series
Chantraine, F., Nisolle, M., Petit, P., Schaaps, J.-P., & Foidart, J.-M. (2012) · jpme · doi:10.1515/jpm-2011-0156 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Ash, A., Smith, A., & Maxwell, D.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-02-13
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 253-263
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2015089806
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Caesarean scar pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01237.x
- The paper
- Ash, A., Smith, A., & Maxwell, D. (2007). Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01237.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.