Pregnancy incidence and outcome among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Please cite this paper as:Kalliala I, Anttila A, Dyba T, Hakulinen T, Halttunen M, Nieminen P. Pregnancy incidence and outcome among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2012;119:227–235. Objective To investigate the effect of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) treatment on incidence of pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland, the sole reference centre in the Helsinki–Uusimaa region for women referred for colposcopy. Population A cohort of 6179 women treated for CIN between 1974 and 2001, and a randomly selected, age‐ and municipality‐matched, reference population of 30 436 women. Methods Based on nationwide registers, all women were followed‐up for pregnancy outcomes until death, emigration, sterilization, or until the end of 2004. Main outcome measures Incidence of any pregnancy, livebirths, miscarriages, extrauterine pregnancies, molar pregnancies, and terminations of pregnancies (TOPs) before and after CIN treatment, estimated by calculating hazard ratios (HRs) with stratified Cox regression and Poisson regression. Results After CIN treatment, both incidence of pregnancy (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.15–1.26;P < 0.001) and incidence of livebirths (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.06–1.18;P < 0.001) were higher among the treated women than among the reference population. Before treatment, only incidence of pregnancy had been elevated among those treated (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.04–1.09;P < 0.001). The incidence of extrauterine pregnancies and of TOPs was significantly elevated among those treated both before and after CIN treatment. Conclusions No clear evidence emerged of adverse effects resulting from the CIN treatment itself, because the women treated had more pregnancies and more children than their reference population. TOPs and extrauterine pregnancies were more common among the treated women already before the CIN treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effect on fertility of ablative therapies such as cryotherapy or laser vaporisation was assessed only in three studies in high-income countries.
“The effect on fertility of ablative therapies such as cryotherapy or laser vaporisation was assessed only in three studies in high‐income countries [13, 14, 15].”
From Fertility and Miscarriage Incidence After Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Treatment by Thermal Ablation: A Cohort Study (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
A meta-analysis published in 2014 assessing fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment of patients with suspected cervical precancerous disease identified only three studies assessing ablative methods, none of which included patients treated by thermal ablation.
“A meta‐analysis published in 2014 [12] assessing fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment of patients with suspected cervical precancerous disease identified only three studies assessing ablative methods [13, 14, 23], none of which included patients treated by TA.”
From Fertility and Miscarriage Incidence After Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Treatment by Thermal Ablation: A Cohort Study (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kyrgiou, M., Athanasiou, A., Paraskevaidi, M., Mitra, A., Kalliala, I., Martin-Hirsch, P., Arbyn, M., Bennett, P., & Paraskevaidis, E. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i3633 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Self-citationWisniak, A., Yakam, V., Bolo, S. E., Moukam, A., Sormani, J., Vassilakos, P., Kenfack, B., & Petignat, P. (2025) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17954 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kalliala, I., Anttila, A., Dyba, T., Hakulinen, T., Halttunen, M., & Nieminen, P.
- Affiliations
- Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
- Finnish Cancer Registry (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Kalliala, I
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-07-27
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227-235
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W1587815895
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, pregnancy incidence, pregnancy outcomes, live birth, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, hydatidiform mole, abortion
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Adolescent, Adult, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Finland, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy, Ectopic, Retrospective Studies, Incidence, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review