Cited by 19Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchReproductive Health and ContraceptionReproductive tract infections research

Pregnancy incidence and outcome among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study

Kalliala, I, Anttila, A, Dyba, T, Hakulinen, T, Halttunen, M, Nieminen, P·2012·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Please cite this paper as:Kalliala I, Anttila A, Dyba T, Hakulinen T, Halttunen M, Nieminen P. Pregnancy incidence and outcome among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2012;119:227–235. Objective To investigate the effect of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) treatment on incidence of pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland, the sole reference centre in the Helsinki–Uusimaa region for women referred for colposcopy. Population A cohort of 6179 women treated for CIN between 1974 and 2001, and a randomly selected, age‐ and municipality‐matched, reference population of 30 436 women. Methods Based on nationwide registers, all women were followed‐up for pregnancy outcomes until death, emigration, sterilization, or until the end of 2004. Main outcome measures Incidence of any pregnancy, livebirths, miscarriages, extrauterine pregnancies, molar pregnancies, and terminations of pregnancies (TOPs) before and after CIN treatment, estimated by calculating hazard ratios (HRs) with stratified Cox regression and Poisson regression. Results After CIN treatment, both incidence of pregnancy (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.15–1.26;P < 0.001) and incidence of livebirths (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.06–1.18;P < 0.001) were higher among the treated women than among the reference population. Before treatment, only incidence of pregnancy had been elevated among those treated (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.04–1.09;P < 0.001). The incidence of extrauterine pregnancies and of TOPs was significantly elevated among those treated both before and after CIN treatment. Conclusions No clear evidence emerged of adverse effects resulting from the CIN treatment itself, because the women treated had more pregnancies and more children than their reference population. TOPs and extrauterine pregnancies were more common among the treated women already before the CIN treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03042.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect on fertility of ablative therapies such as cryotherapy or laser vaporisation was assessed only in three studies in high-income countries.

    “The effect on fertility of ablative therapies such as cryotherapy or laser vaporisation was assessed only in three studies in high‐income countries [13, 14, 15].”
  • A meta-analysis published in 2014 assessing fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment of patients with suspected cervical precancerous disease identified only three studies assessing ablative methods, none of which included patients treated by thermal ablation.

    “A meta‐analysis published in 2014 [12] assessing fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment of patients with suspected cervical precancerous disease identified only three studies assessing ablative methods [13, 14, 23], none of which included patients treated by TA.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalliala, I., Anttila, A., Dyba, T., Hakulinen, T., Halttunen, M., & Nieminen, P.
Affiliations
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
  • Finnish Cancer Registry (FI)
Corresponding author
Kalliala, I
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-27
Volume
119
Issue
2
Pages
227-235
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W1587815895
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, pregnancy incidence, pregnancy outcomes, live birth, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, hydatidiform mole, abortion
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adolescent, Adult, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Finland, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy, Ectopic, Retrospective Studies, Incidence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review