The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health information in Italian public health websites: moving from inaccessibility to accessibility
Open accessAbstract
Aims: In January 2004, the Italian government passed new legislation designed to give people with disabilities access to online services. Starting from the new legislation requirements, the purpose of this study is to investigate whether Italian Local Health Authorities websites are accessible to users with different abilities. Methods: One hundred and seventy websites were analysed evaluating their compliance to the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Priority 1 guidelines via a combination of appropriate accessibility testing methods. This review was carried out twice: the first time it took place between the end of 2003 and May–June 2004. The same survey was repeated again in December 2004, after the issuing of the draft of the Implementation Regulations for The Stanca Law in July 2004. In this second survey, all the websites analysed before were checked again to establish if some measures to make those sites accessible were taken. Results: Seventy‐six per cent of the analysed websites fail to satisfy the most basic W3C requirements, but Italian Local Health Authorities websites are likely to present significant improvements to access for some disabled user groups: the number of accessible websites increased consistently between the first and the second review. Conclusions: It seems that awareness of web accessibility issues is increasing among developers of health information websites because of law enforcement. Recommendations for future research and development are offered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, research conducted on Italian public health institutions' websites showed that their level of accessibility is extremely modest [65,66].”
From Web Accessibility for People with Disabilities in the European Union: Paving the Road to Social Inclusion (2018) · cites this paper as [66]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pew Internet and American Life Project
Barrett, C. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39903-0_1474 · Cited by 596
Quality of internet access: barrier behind internet use statistics
Skinner, H. A., Biscope, S., & Poland, B. D. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00455-0 · Cited by 154
Zeng, X., & Parmanto, B. (2004) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6.2.e19 · Cited by 82
Disenfranchising the Disabled: The Inaccessibility of Internet-Based Health Information
Davis, J. J. (2002) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730290001701 · Cited by 47
Health websites in Italy: use, classification and international policy
Giacomo, P. D., & Maceratini, R. (2002) · Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine · doi:10.1080/1463923021000014112 · Cited by 15
Creating accessible Web sites: an introduction
Lilly, E. B. (2001) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/eum0000000006512 · Cited by 14
Involving Users in the Development of a Web Accessibility Tool
Craven, J., & Snaprud, M. (2005) · e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Alexander D., 2004, How accessible are Australian university websites?, Ariadne, 38
- Bernardini A.Annual report on accessibility of Italian public websites.Paper Presented at the Conference: Webxtutti: dall’Accessibilità dei Contenuti all’Accessibilità dei Servizi Rome Italy June 20 2003.Available from:http://www.webxtutti.it/programma.htm(accessed 9 August 2005).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ferri, D., & Favalli, S. (2018) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc8020040 · Cited by 104
“For example, research conducted on Italian public health institutions’ websites showed that their level of accessibility is extremely modest [65,66].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Mancini, C., Zedda, M., & Barbaro, A.
- Affiliations
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Mancini, Cristina
- Venue
- Health Information & Libraries Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-16
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 276-285
- ISSN
- 1471-1834 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-1842
- OpenAlex
- W1812840980
- Semantic Scholar
- 2610f10cc0387c15e8424dc9d06473713dad59ad
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Information & Libraries Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- web accessibility, health information websites, local health authorities, disability, W3C accessibility guidelines, disability law, online health information, Italy
- MeSH terms
- Consumer Behavior, Persons with Disabilities, Health Education, Humans, Information Services, Italy, Organizational Innovation, Patient Education as Topic, Library Materials, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
