Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

DEVELOPMENTAL PROFILES OF GANGLIOSIDES IN HUMAN AND RAT BRAIN

Vanier, M. T., Holm, M., ÖHman, R., Svennerholm, L.·1971·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Abstract— The developmental profiles of individual gangliosides of human brain were compared with those of rat brain. Interest was focused mainly on the pre‐ and early postnatal development. Human frontal lobe cortex covering the period from 10 foetal weeks to adult age and the cerebrum of rat from birth to 21 days were analysed. Lipid‐NANA and lipid‐P were followed; in the rat, also protein and brain weight. A limited number of samples of human cerebral white matter and cerebellar cortex were also studied. The following major results were obtained: The ganglioside concentration increased approximately three‐fold within a short period: in rat cerebrum, from birth to the 17th day; in human cerebral cortex, from the 15th foetal week to the age of about 6 months. The largest increase in the rat brain occurred by the 11th to the 13th day; in human brain by term. The relative increase of gangliosides during this period was more rapid than that of phospholipids. A hitherto unknown distinct early period of ganglioside and phospholipid formation in rat occurred by the second to fourth day. The changes in brain ganglioside pattern, characteristic of the developmental stages of the rat, were found to be equally pronounced in the human brain. Regional developmental differences in the ganglioside pattern were demonstrated in human brain. A characteristic white matter pattern, rich in monosialogangliosides, had developed by the age of 1 year. The increase in ganglioside concentration and the formation of the definitive ganglioside pattern of cerebellar cortex occurred later than in cerebral cortex. This cerebellar pattern was characterized by a very large trisialoganglioside fraction. The two periods of rapid ganglioside metabolism in rat brain preceded the two periods of rapid protein biosynthesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1971.tb11988.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Vanier, M. T., Holm, M., ÖHman, R., & Svennerholm, L.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1971-04
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
581-592
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2085459182
Cited by
291
References
0
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DEVELOPMENTAL PROFILES OF GANGLIOSIDES IN HUMAN AND RAT BRAIN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1971.tb11988.x
The paper
Vanier, M. T., Holm, M., ÖHman, R., & Svennerholm, L. (1971). DEVELOPMENTAL PROFILES OF GANGLIOSIDES IN HUMAN AND RAT BRAIN. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1971.tb11988.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.