Cited by 55Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingEpilepsy research and treatment

Interaction between ephrins/Eph receptors and excitatory amino acid receptors: possible relevance in the regulation of synaptic plasticity and in the pathophysiology of neuronal degeneration

Calò, Laura, Cinque, Carlo, Patanè, Monica, Schillaci, Danilo, Battaglia, Giuseppe, Melchiorri, Daniela, Nicoletti, Ferdinando, Bruno, Valeria·2006·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that Eph receptors and their transmembrane ligands, named ephrins, interact with glutamate receptors in both developing and adult neurons. EphB receptors interact with proteins that regulate the membrane trafficking of α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methylisoxazole‐4‐propionate (AMPA) receptor subunits, and both ephrins and EphB receptors have been found to co‐localize with N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate (NMDA) receptors and to positively modulate NMDA receptor function. Moreover, pharmacologic activation of ephrin‐Bs amplifies group‐I metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling through mechanisms that involve NMDA receptors. The interaction with ionotropic or metabotropic glutamate receptors provides a substrate for the emerging role of ephrins and Eph receptors in the regulation of activity‐dependent forms of synaptic plasticity, such as long‐term potentiation and long‐term depression, which are established electrophysiologic models of associative learning. In addition, these interactions explain the involvement of ephrins/Eph receptors in the regulation of pain threshold and epileptogenesis, as well as their potential implication in processes of neuronal degeneration. This may stimulate the search for new drugs that might modulate excitatory synaptic transmission by interacting with the ephrin/Eph receptor system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03844.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calò, L., Cinque, C., Patanè, M., Schillaci, D., Battaglia, G., Melchiorri, D., Nicoletti, F., & Bruno, V.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo (IT)
Corresponding author
Bruno, Valeria
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-05-30
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2060623922
Cited by
55
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
Keywords
ephrins, Eph receptors, EphB receptors, glutamate receptors, AMPA receptors, NMDA receptor, metabotropic glutamate receptors, synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation, long-term depression, neurodegeneration, pain threshold, epileptogenesis, excitatory synaptic transmission, receptor trafficking
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Receptors, Glutamate, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Receptors, Eph Family, Ephrins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review