Cited by 32Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase1 enhances contextual fear memory formation through down-regulation of the expression of Hes5

Lee, Ching T., Ma, Yun L., Lee, Eminy H. Y.·2007·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase plays an important role in memory formation and directly phosphorylates serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase1 (SGK1) at Ser78. In this study, we examined the role and mechanism of SGK1 Ser78 activation involved in contextual fear memory formation in rats. Results revealed that SGK1 Ser78 phosphorylation was increased 30 min, 1 h and 3 h after training. Transient transfection of the dominant negative mutant of sgk, sgkS78A, to hippocampal neurons impaired, whereas transfection of the constitutively active sgk, sgkS78D, enhanced fear retention. Microarray analysis identified 14 genes that showed more than threefold alteration in their gene expression in sgkS78A-transfected animals 6 h after training. One of them is Hairy and Enhancer of split 5 (Hes5). The expression level of Hes5 is approximately 4.4-fold higher in sgkS78A-transfected animals. Further analyses revealed that Hes5 level is markedly decreased after training in control animals, but sgkS78A markedly increased Hes5 level after training. RNA interference experiment showed that shHes5 dose-dependently enhanced fear retention, whereas over-expression of Hes5 impaired fear retention. Moreover, shHes5 at a lower concentration completely blocked the memory-impairing effect of sgkS78A. These results together suggest that Hes5 negatively regulates contextual fear memory formation and SGK activation down-regulates Hes5 expression to enhance fear ret…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04284.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transfection of inactive SGK1 to hippocampal neurons impairs fear retention.

    “Transfection of inactive SGK1 to hippocampal neurons further impaired, whereas transfection of constitutively active SGK1 enhanced, fear retention (Lee et al. 2007).”

    From Significance of SGK1 in the regulation of neuronal function (2010) · cites this paper as Lee et al. 2007

  • SGK1 downregulation of Hes5 results in enhanced fear retention.

    “SGK1 downregulates Hairy and Enhancer of split 5 (Hes5) resulting in enhanced fear retention, whereas over-expression of Hes5 negatively regulates contextual fear memory formation (Lee et al. 2007).”

    From Significance of SGK1 in the regulation of neuronal function (2010) · cites this paper as Lee et al. 2007

  • Transfection of constitutively active SGK1 to hippocampal neurons enhances fear retention.

    “Transfection of inactive SGK1 to hippocampal neurons further impaired, whereas transfection of constitutively active SGK1 enhanced, fear retention (Lee et al. 2007).”

    From Significance of SGK1 in the regulation of neuronal function (2010) · cites this paper as Lee et al. 2007

  • SGK1 downregulates Hairy and Enhancer of split 5 (Hes5).

    “SGK1 downregulates Hairy and Enhancer of split 5 (Hes5) resulting in enhanced fear retention, whereas over-expression of Hes5 negatively regulates contextual fear memory formation (Lee et al. 2007).”

    From Significance of SGK1 in the regulation of neuronal function (2010) · cites this paper as Lee et al. 2007

  • Over-expression of Hes5 negatively regulates contextual fear memory formation.

    “SGK1 downregulates Hairy and Enhancer of split 5 (Hes5) resulting in enhanced fear retention, whereas over-expression of Hes5 negatively regulates contextual fear memory formation (Lee et al. 2007).”

    From Significance of SGK1 in the regulation of neuronal function (2010) · cites this paper as Lee et al. 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, C. T., Ma, Y. L., & Lee, E. H. Y.
Affiliations
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica (TW)
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11
Volume
100
Issue
6
Pages
1531-1542
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2086979442
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
SGK1, serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1, Hes5, contextual fear memory, ERK signaling, hippocampal neurons, gene expression regulation, dominant-negative mutant, shRNA knockdown
MeSH terms
Serum-Glucocorticoid Regulated Kinases, Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Classical, Fear, Male, Memory, Motor Activity, Repressor Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Serine, Time Factors, Down-Regulation, PC12 Cells, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Immediate-Early Proteins, Gene Transfer Techniques, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Animals, Genetically Modified, RNA Interference, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Rats, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review