Direct analysis of tau from PSP brain identifies new phosphorylation sites and a major fragment of N‐terminally cleaved tau containing four microtubule‐binding repeats
Abstract
Tangles containing hyperphosphorylated aggregates of insoluble tau are a pathological hallmark of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Several phosphorylation sites on tau in PSP have been identified using phospho-specific antibodies, but no sites have been determined by direct sequencing due to the difficulty in enriching insoluble tau from PSP brain. We describe a new method to enrich insoluble PSP-tau and report eight phosphorylation sites [Ser46, Thr181, Ser202, Thr217, Thr231, Ser235, Ser396/Ser400 (one site) and Thr403/Ser404 (one site)] identified by mass spectrometry. We also describe a 35 kDa C-terminal tau fragment (tau35), lacking the N-terminus of tau but containing four microtubule-binding repeats (4R), that is present only in neurodegenerative disorders in which 4R tau is over-represented. Tau35 was readily detectable in PSP, corticobasal degeneration and 4R forms of fronto-temporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17, but was absent from control, Alzheimer's disease and Pick's disease brain. Our findings suggest the aggregatory characteristics of PSP-tau differ from those of insoluble tau in Alzheimer's disease brain and this might be related to the presence of a C-terminal cleavage product of tau.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tau phosphorylation at S202/T205 as detected by the AT8 antibody is commonly found in tauopathies.
“Tau phosphorylation at S202/T205 as detected by the AT8 antibody (80) is commonly found in tauopathies (38,81–84).”
From Functional genomic screen and network analysis reveal novel modifiers of tauopathy dissociated from tau phosphorylation (2011) · cites this paper as [81]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- Wray, S., Saxton, M., Anderton, B. H., & Hanger, D. P.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wray, Selina
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02-28
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2343-2352
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W1847923468
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University College London
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- tau phosphorylation sites, progressive supranuclear palsy, tau tangles, hyperphosphorylated tau, microtubule-binding repeats, 4R tau, corticobasal degeneration, frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism, Alzheimer's disease, Pick's disease, tau aggregation
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Brain Chemistry, Humans, Microtubules, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptide Fragments, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Solubility, Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive, tau Proteins, Terminal Repeat Sequences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review