Cited by 97Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Direct analysis of tau from PSP brain identifies new phosphorylation sites and a major fragment of N‐terminally cleaved tau containing four microtubule‐binding repeats

Wray, Selina, Saxton, Malcolm, Anderton, Brian H., Hanger, Diane P.·2008·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Tangles containing hyperphosphorylated aggregates of insoluble tau are a pathological hallmark of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Several phosphorylation sites on tau in PSP have been identified using phospho-specific antibodies, but no sites have been determined by direct sequencing due to the difficulty in enriching insoluble tau from PSP brain. We describe a new method to enrich insoluble PSP-tau and report eight phosphorylation sites [Ser46, Thr181, Ser202, Thr217, Thr231, Ser235, Ser396/Ser400 (one site) and Thr403/Ser404 (one site)] identified by mass spectrometry. We also describe a 35 kDa C-terminal tau fragment (tau35), lacking the N-terminus of tau but containing four microtubule-binding repeats (4R), that is present only in neurodegenerative disorders in which 4R tau is over-represented. Tau35 was readily detectable in PSP, corticobasal degeneration and 4R forms of fronto-temporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17, but was absent from control, Alzheimer's disease and Pick's disease brain. Our findings suggest the aggregatory characteristics of PSP-tau differ from those of insoluble tau in Alzheimer's disease brain and this might be related to the presence of a C-terminal cleavage product of tau.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05321.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 97

Authors
Wray, S., Saxton, M., Anderton, B. H., & Hanger, D. P.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Wray, Selina
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-28
Volume
105
Issue
6
Pages
2343-2352
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W1847923468
Cited by
97
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University College London
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
tau phosphorylation sites, progressive supranuclear palsy, tau tangles, hyperphosphorylated tau, microtubule-binding repeats, 4R tau, corticobasal degeneration, frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism, Alzheimer's disease, Pick's disease, tau aggregation
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Brain Chemistry, Humans, Microtubules, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptide Fragments, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Solubility, Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive, tau Proteins, Terminal Repeat Sequences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review