Phosphorylation status of the NR2B subunit of NMDA receptor regulates its interaction with calcium/calmodulin‐dependent protein kinase II
Abstract
Ca(2+) influx through NMDA-type glutamate receptor at excitatory synapses causes activation of post-synaptic Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II (CaMKII) and its translocation to the NR2B subunit of NMDA receptor. The major binding site for CaMKII on NR2B undergoes phosphorylation at Ser1303, in vivo. Even though some regulatory effects of this phosphorylation are known, the mode of dephosphorylation of NR2B-Ser1303 is still unclear. We show that phosphorylation status at Ser1303 enables NR2B to distinguish between the Ca(2+)/calmodulin activated form and the autonomously active Thr286-autophosphorylated form of CaMKII. Green fluorescent protein-alpha-CaMKII co-expressed with NR2B sequence in human embryonic kidney 293 cells was used to study intracellular binding between the two proteins. Binding in vitro was studied by glutathione-S-transferase pull-down assay. Thr286-autophosphorylated alpha-CaMKII or the autophosphorylation mimicking mutant, T286D-alpha-CaMKII, binds NR2B sequence independent of Ca(2+)/calmodulin unlike native wild-type alpha-CaMKII. We show enhancement of this binding by Ca(2+)/calmodulin. Phosphorylation or a phosphorylation mimicking mutation on NR2B (NR2B-S1303D) abolishes the Ca(2+)/calmodulin-independent binding whereas it allows the Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent binding of alpha-CaMKII in vitro. Similarly, the autonomously active mutants, T286D-alpha-CaMKII and F293E/N294D-alpha-CaMKII, exhibited Ca(2+)-independent binding to non-phosp…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Phosphorylation at S1303 promotes slow dissociation of CaMKII.
“however, phosphorylation at S1303 does promote slow dissociation of CaMKII (123, 125, 126).”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [126]
Cites
Interaction with the NMDA receptor locks CaMKII in an active conformation
Bayer, K.-U., De Koninck, P., Leonard, A. S., Hell, J. W., & Schulman, H. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35081080 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Patton, B. L., Miller, S. G., & Kennedy, M. B. (1990) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)38577-1 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Hudmon, A., LeBel, E., Roy, H., Sik, A., Schulman, H., Waxham, M. N., & De Koninck, P. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4698-04.2005 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Role of NMDA Receptors in Alzheimer’s Disease
Liu, J., Chang, L., Song, Y., Li, H., & Wu, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00043 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
The role of metaplasticity mechanisms in regulating memory destabilization and reconsolidation
Finnie, P. S. B., & Nader, K. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.03.008 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Nicoll, R. A., & Schulman, H. (2023) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00034.2022 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“The predominant interaction of CaMKII to GluN2B is not via the catalytic site (S site), as it is not blocked by syntide-2 (125); however, phosphorylation at S1303 does promote slow dissociation of CaMKII (123, 125, 126).”
BackgroundStress-Induced Changes of Hippocampal NMDA Receptors: Modulation by Duloxetine Treatment
Calabrese, F., Guidotti, G., Molteni, R., Racagni, G., Mancini, M., & Riva, M. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037916 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Vavers, E., Zvejniece, L., & Dambrova, M. (2023) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106771 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Kim, K.-S., Kim, H., Park, S.-K., & Han, P.-L. (2012) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.10.016 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Raveendran, R., Devi Suma Priya, S., Mayadevi, M., Steephan, M., Santhoshkumar, T. R., Cheriyan, J., Sanalkumar, R., Pradeep, K. K., James, J., & Omkumar, R. V.
- Affiliations
- Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology (IN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06-15
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-105
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W2073221051
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Signaling Pathways in Disease
- Keywords
- NMDA receptor, NR2B subunit, CaMKII, protein phosphorylation, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, protein phosphatase 1, protein phosphatase 2A, dephosphorylation, excitatory synapses, synaptic plasticity
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Binding Sites, Cell Line, Central Nervous System, Humans, Insecta, Mutation, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Serine, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Glutamic Acid, Protein Transport, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review