Cited by 222Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Effects of acute and chronic administration of atomoxetine and methylphenidate on extracellular levels of noradrenaline, dopamine and serotonin in the prefrontal cortex and striatum of mice

Open access
Koda, Ken, Ago, Yukio, Cong, Yana, Kita, Yuki, Takuma, Kazuhiro, Matsuda, Toshio·2010·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Acute administration of atomoxetine and methylphenidate, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) drugs, activates catecholaminergic systems in rat brain, but the effects of their chronic administration are not known. This study examined the effects of acute and chronic administration of ADHD drugs on the extracellular levels of noradrenaline (NA), dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT), and the expression of the neuronal activity marker c-Fos in the prefrontal cortex and striatum of mice. Acute ADHD drugs increased NA and DA, but not 5-HT, levels in the prefrontal cortex of mice. Maximal effects of atomoxetine and methylphenidate were observed at 1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg, respectively. At these doses, both drugs did not affect the spontaneous locomotor activity of mice. Chronic administration of atomoxetine 1 mg/kg and methylphenidate 3 mg/kg for 21 days also increased NA and DA, but not 5-HT, levels in the prefrontal cortex. The increases in NA levels induced by atomoxetine, but not methylphenidate, were reduced by chronic treatment. In contrast, acute and chronic administration of atomoxetine 1 mg/kg and methylphenidate 3 mg/kg did not affect the monoamine levels in the striatum. Acute and chronic atomoxetine 1 mg/kg and methylphenidate 3 mg/kg increased the expression of c-Fos in the prefrontal cortex, but not in the striatum, to a similar extent. These results suggest that acute and chronic administration of the ADHD drugs selectively activate the prefrontal catecholamine…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06750.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 55 · Cited by 222

Authors
Koda, K., Ago, Y., Cong, Y., Kita, Y., Takuma, K., & Matsuda, T.
Affiliations
The University of Osaka (JP)
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-08
Volume
114
Issue
1
Pages
259-270
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W1865055600
Cited by
222
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
11.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
atomoxetine, methylphenidate, norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin, prefrontal cortex, striatum, Fos expression, catecholaminergic system, chronic drug administration, acute drug administration
MeSH terms
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Animals, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Extracellular Space, Male, Methylphenidate, Mice, Inbred ICR, Motor Activity, Neurons, Norepinephrine, Propylamines, Serotonin, Biogenic Monoamines, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Prefrontal Cortex, Microdialysis, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review