The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women Who Use Domestic Violence Shelters: Changes in Depression Over Time
Abstract
This study examined the levels of depression reported by women who had used a domestic violence shelter. Depressive symptoms were assessed three times: immediately after shelter exit, 10 weeks thereafter, and 6 months later. Whereas 83% of the women reported at least mild depression on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale upon shelter exit, only 58% were depressed 10 weeks later. This did not change at the 6-month follow-up. An ecological, longitudinal model was evaluated to predict battered women's depression 8 1/2 months postshelter exit. Results of hierarchical regression analyses suggested that, after controlling for previous levels of depression, the women's feelings of powerlessness, experience of abuse, and decreased social support contributed to their depression symptoms. The women's scores on these three variables (feelings of powerlessness, abuse, and social support) at 10 weeks postshelter exit and at 6-month follow-up predicted depression at 6 months. Thus, there were both predictive and concurrent effects for these constructs. Implications for clinical and community interventions are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
An advocacy intervention program for women with abusive partners: Initial evaluation
Sullivan, C. M., Tan, C., Basta, J., Rumptz, M., & Davidson, W. S. (1992) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00937912 · Cited by 204
Self-citation
Cited by
Health consequences of intimate partner violence
Campbell, J. C. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08336-8 · Cited by 4,055
Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis
Golding, J. M. (1999) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1023/a:1022079418229 · Cited by 1,788
Interventions for Violence Against Women: Scientific Review
Wathen, C. N., & MacMillan, H. L. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.5.589 · Cited by 513
Anderson, D. K., & Saunders, D. G. (2003) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838002250769 · Cited by 462
Zlotnick, C., Johnson, D. M., & Kohn, R. (2006) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260505282564 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, R., Sullivan, C. M., & Davidson, W. S.
- Venue
- Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 237-255
- ISSN
- 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6402
- OpenAlex
- W2156583686
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women Who Use Domestic Violence Shelters: Changes in Depression Over Time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00290.x
- The paper
- Campbell, R., Sullivan, C. M., & Davidson, W. S. (1995). Women Who Use Domestic Violence Shelters: Changes in Depression Over Time. Psychology of Women Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00290.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.