Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,475

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An inexpensive, automation‐friendly protocol for recovering high‐quality DNA

IVANOVA, NATALIA V., DEWAARD, JEREMY R., HEBERT, PAUL D. N.·2006·Molecular Ecology Notes

Abstract

Although commercial kits are available for automated DNA extraction, ‘artisanal’ protocols are not. In this study, we present a silica‐based method that is sensitive, inexpensive and compliant with automation. The effectiveness of this protocol has now been tested on more than 5000 animal specimens with highly positive results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01428.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,475

Metadata

Authors
IVANOVA, N. V., DEWAARD, J. R., & HEBERT, P. D. N.
Venue
Molecular Ecology Notes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-07
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
998-1002
ISSN
  • 1471-8278 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8286
OpenAlex
W1605875024
Cited by
1,475
References
0
FWCI
8.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An inexpensive, automation‐friendly protocol for recovering high‐quality DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01428.x
The paper
IVANOVA, N. V., DEWAARD, J. R., & HEBERT, P. D. N. (2006). An inexpensive, automation‐friendly protocol for recovering high‐quality DNA. Molecular Ecology Notes. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01428.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.