Cited by 76Environmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesIdentification and Quantification in FoodFish Biology and Ecology Studies

High‐throughput species identification: from DNA isolation to bioinformatics

RICHARDSON, DAVID E., VANWYE, JEFFREY D., EXUM, AMY M., COWEN, ROBERT K., CRAWFORD, DOUGLAS L.·2007·Molecular Ecology Notes

Abstract

Ichthyoplankton collections provide a valuable means to study fish life histories. However, these collections are greatly underutilized, as larval fishes are frequently not identified to species due to their small size and limited morphological development. Currently, there is an effort underway to make species identification more readily available across a broad range of taxa through the sequencing of a standard gene. This effort requires the development of new methodologies to both rapidly produce and analyse large numbers of sequences. The methodology presented in this paper addresses these issues with a focus on the larvae of large pelagic fish species. All steps of the methodology are targeted towards high‐throughput identification using small amounts of tissue. To accomplish this, DNA isolation was automated on a liquid‐handling robot using magnetic bead technologies. Polymerase chain reaction and a unidirectional sequencing reaction followed standard protocols with all template cleanup and transferring also automated. Manual pipetting was thus reduced to a minimum. A character‐based bioinformatics program was developed to handle the large sequence output. This program incorporates base‐call quality scores in two types of sample to voucher sequence comparisons and provides suggested identifications and sequence information in an easily interpreted spreadsheet format. This technique when applied to tuna and billfish larvae collected in the Straits of Florida had an 89% s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01620.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RICHARDSON, D. E., VANWYE, J. D., EXUM, A. M., COWEN, R. K., & CRAWFORD, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
RICHARDSON, DAVID E.
Venue
Molecular Ecology Notes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12-20
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
199-207
ISSN
  • 1471-8278 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8286
OpenAlex
W2097702544
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Molecular Ecology Notes (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission
  • University of Miami
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
ichthyoplankton, larval fish identification, species identification, next-generation sequencing, DNA extraction, magnetic bead DNA extraction, tuna larvae, Thunnus atlanticus, Makaira nigricans, Istiophorus platypterus, large pelagic fish, fish life history, Florida Straits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review