Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bacterial and iron oxide aggregates mediate secondary iron mineral formation: green rust versus magnetite

ZEGEYE, A., MUSTIN, C., JORAND, F.·2010·Geobiology

Abstract

In the presence of methanoate as electron donor, Shewanella putrefaciens, a Gram‐negative, facultative anaerobe, is able to transform lepidocrocite (γ‐FeOOH) to secondary Fe (II–III) minerals such as carbonated green rust (GR1) and magnetite. When bacterial cells were added to a γ‐FeOOH suspension, aggregates were produced consisting of both bacteria and γ‐FeOOH particles. Recently, we showed that the production of secondary minerals (GR1 vs. magnetite) was dependent on bacterial cell density and not only on iron reduction rates. Thus, γ‐FeOOH and S. putrefaciens aggregation pattern was suggested as the main mechanism driving mineralization. In this study, lepidocrocite bioreduction experiments, in the presence of anthraquinone disulfonate, were conducted by varying the [cell]/[lepidocrocite] ratio in order to determine whether different types of aggregate are formed, which may facilitate precipitation of GR1 as opposed to magnetite. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to analyze the relative cell surface area and lepidocrocite concentration within the aggregates and captured images were characterized by statistical methods for spatial data (i.e. variograms). These results suggest that the [cell]/[lepidocrocite] ratio influenced both the aggregate structure and the nature of the secondary iron mineral formed. Subsequently, a [cell]/[lepidocrocite] ratio above 1 × 10 7 cells mmol−1 leads to densely packed aggregates and to the formation of GR1. Below this ratio, looser aggregates are formed and magnetite was systematically produced. The data presented in this study bring us closer to a more comprehensive understanding of the parameters governing the formation of minerals in dense bacterial suspensions and suggest that screening mineral–bacteria aggregate structure is critical to understanding (bio)mineralization pathways.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2010.00238.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1080/01490450701436497 · DOI
  2. 10.1146/annurev.mi.43.100189.001051 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/es026341p · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.gca.2006.04.029 · DOI
  5. Caccavo F, 1997, Role of hydrophobicity in adhesion of the dissimilatory Fe(III)‐reducing bacterium Shewanella alga to amorphous Fe(III) oxide, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63, 3837, 10.1128/aem.63.10.3837-3843.1997 · DOI
  6. Cornell RM, 1996, The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses
  7. 10.1016/j.gca.2009.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1529/biophysj.105.068205 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/la011011o · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0010-938X(95)00096-3 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/es980221t · DOI
  12. 10.1039/an9750000549 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0016-7037(02)00988-2 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.04.017 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0010-938X(96)00072-8 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/es970547m · DOI
  17. 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5544-5550.2001 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01199-7 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00276-X · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1180/claymin.1989.024.4.08 · DOI
  21. 10.1346/CCMN.2007.0550108 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00306-0 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02225.x · DOI
  24. Jorand F, 2009, Influence of cell bodies and organic polymers on the secondary mineral formation (green‐rust vs magnetite) from gamma‐FeOOH bioreduction. Proc. of the 19th Annual V.M. Goldschmidt Conference, Davos, Switzerland, 21–26 June 2009, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 73, A605
  25. 10.1128/AEM.68.9.4653-4657.2002 · DOI
  26. 10.2138/am.2005.1727 · DOI
  27. 10.1128/9781555818098.ch1 · DOI
  28. 10.1128/JB.01518-06 · DOI
  29. 10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jssc.2007.10.026 · DOI
  31. 10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.001523 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/01490450701459333 · DOI · Paper page
  33. O’Loughlin EJ, 2009, Effects of oxyanions, natural organic matter, and Fe(III) oxide mineralogy on the formation of Fe(II)‐bearing secondary mineralization products resulting from the bioreduction of Fe(III) oxides. Proceedings of the 19th Annual V.M. Goldschmidt Conference, Davos, Switzerland, 21–26 June 2009, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 73, A959
  34. 10.1021/es0020456 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Ona‐Nguema G, 2003, Key role of the kinetics of γ‐FeOOH bioreduction on the formation of Fe(II)‐Fe(III) minerals, Hyperfine Interaction (C), 5, 415
  36. 10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.005 · DOI
  37. 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2501-2510.2005 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.poly.2008.12.034 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/01490450252864280 · DOI
  40. 10.1021/es9506216 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/S1293-2558(03)00121-3 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00667-2 · DOI
  43. 10.1039/dt9830000189 · DOI
  44. 10.1128/AEM.01163-06 · DOI
  45. 10.1021/la00037a057 · DOI
  46. Vroom JM, 1999, Depth penetration and detection of pH gradients in biofilms by two‐photon excitation microscopy, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 3502, 10.1128/AEM.65.8.3502-3511.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1007/BF02045792 · DOI
  48. 10.1080/01490450252864271 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1080/01490450500248960 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1080/01490450601134325 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 49

Metadata

Authors
ZEGEYE, A., MUSTIN, C., & JORAND, F.
Venue
Geobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-13
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
209-222
ISSN
  • 1472-4677
  • 1472-4669
Cited by
49
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review