The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial and iron oxide aggregates mediate secondary iron mineral formation: green rust versus magnetite
Abstract
In the presence of methanoate as electron donor, Shewanella putrefaciens, a Gram‐negative, facultative anaerobe, is able to transform lepidocrocite (γ‐FeOOH) to secondary Fe (II–III) minerals such as carbonated green rust (GR1) and magnetite. When bacterial cells were added to a γ‐FeOOH suspension, aggregates were produced consisting of both bacteria and γ‐FeOOH particles. Recently, we showed that the production of secondary minerals (GR1 vs. magnetite) was dependent on bacterial cell density and not only on iron reduction rates. Thus, γ‐FeOOH and S. putrefaciens aggregation pattern was suggested as the main mechanism driving mineralization. In this study, lepidocrocite bioreduction experiments, in the presence of anthraquinone disulfonate, were conducted by varying the [cell]/[lepidocrocite] ratio in order to determine whether different types of aggregate are formed, which may facilitate precipitation of GR1 as opposed to magnetite. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to analyze the relative cell surface area and lepidocrocite concentration within the aggregates and captured images were characterized by statistical methods for spatial data (i.e. variograms). These results suggest that the [cell]/[lepidocrocite] ratio influenced both the aggregate structure and the nature of the secondary iron mineral formed. Subsequently, a [cell]/[lepidocrocite] ratio above 1 × 10 7 cells mmol−1 leads to densely packed aggregates and to the formation of GR1. Below this ratio, looser aggregates are formed and magnetite was systematically produced. The data presented in this study bring us closer to a more comprehensive understanding of the parameters governing the formation of minerals in dense bacterial suspensions and suggest that screening mineral–bacteria aggregate structure is critical to understanding (bio)mineralization pathways.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Many factors have been identified as contributing to the formation of specific Fe(II)-bearing secondary minerals as products of DIR, including Fe(III) oxide mineralogy, [20,35]; Fe(III) oxide particle aggregation, [41]; the rate and extent of Fe(II) production, [33,35,42,43]; the presence of electron shuttles, [33]; the species and population size of the DIRB, [44][45][46]; the presence of oxyanio”
From Electron Donor Utilization and Secondary Mineral Formation during the Bioreduction of Lepidocrocite by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 (2019) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
Fredrickson, J. K., Zachara, J. M., Kennedy, D. W., Dong, H., Onstott, T. C., Hinman, N. W., & Li, S.-M. (1998) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(98)00243-9 · Cited by 807
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.1080/01490450701436497 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.mi.43.100189.001051 · DOI
- 10.1021/es026341p · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gca.2006.04.029 · DOI
- Caccavo F, 1997, Role of hydrophobicity in adhesion of the dissimilatory Fe(III)‐reducing bacterium Shewanella alga to amorphous Fe(III) oxide, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63, 3837, 10.1128/aem.63.10.3837-3843.1997 · DOI
- Cornell RM, 1996, The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses
- 10.1016/j.gca.2009.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1529/biophysj.105.068205 · DOI
- 10.1021/la011011o · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-938X(95)00096-3 · DOI
- 10.1021/es980221t · DOI
- 10.1039/an9750000549 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0016-7037(02)00988-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.04.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0010-938X(96)00072-8 · DOI
- 10.1021/es970547m · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5544-5550.2001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01199-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00276-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1180/claymin.1989.024.4.08 · DOI
- 10.1346/CCMN.2007.0550108 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00306-0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02225.x · DOI
- Jorand F, 2009, Influence of cell bodies and organic polymers on the secondary mineral formation (green‐rust vs magnetite) from gamma‐FeOOH bioreduction. Proc. of the 19th Annual V.M. Goldschmidt Conference, Davos, Switzerland, 21–26 June 2009, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 73, A605
- 10.1128/AEM.68.9.4653-4657.2002 · DOI
- 10.2138/am.2005.1727 · DOI
- 10.1128/9781555818098.ch1 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.01518-06 · DOI
- 10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jssc.2007.10.026 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.001523 · DOI
- 10.1080/01490450701459333 · DOI · Paper page
- O’Loughlin EJ, 2009, Effects of oxyanions, natural organic matter, and Fe(III) oxide mineralogy on the formation of Fe(II)‐bearing secondary mineralization products resulting from the bioreduction of Fe(III) oxides. Proceedings of the 19th Annual V.M. Goldschmidt Conference, Davos, Switzerland, 21–26 June 2009, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 73, A959
- 10.1021/es0020456 · DOI · Paper page
- Ona‐Nguema G, 2003, Key role of the kinetics of γ‐FeOOH bioreduction on the formation of Fe(II)‐Fe(III) minerals, Hyperfine Interaction (C), 5, 415
- 10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2501-2510.2005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.poly.2008.12.034 · DOI
- 10.1080/01490450252864280 · DOI
- 10.1021/es9506216 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1293-2558(03)00121-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00667-2 · DOI
- 10.1039/dt9830000189 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.01163-06 · DOI
- 10.1021/la00037a057 · DOI
- Vroom JM, 1999, Depth penetration and detection of pH gradients in biofilms by two‐photon excitation microscopy, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 3502, 10.1128/AEM.65.8.3502-3511.1999 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02045792 · DOI
- 10.1080/01490450252864271 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01490450500248960 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01490450601134325 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Etique, M., Jorand, F. P. A., & Ruby, C. (2016) · Geobiology · doi:10.1111/gbi.12170 · Cited by 37
Self-citationO’Loughlin, E. J., Gorski, C. A., Flynn, T. M., & Scherer, M. M. (2019) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min9070434 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- ZEGEYE, A., MUSTIN, C., & JORAND, F.
- Venue
- Geobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-05-13
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209-222
- ISSN
- 1472-4677
- 1472-4669
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review