Factors involved in binding of Lactobacillus plantarum Lp6 to rat small intestinal mucus
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the adhesion determinants of Lactobacillus plantarum Lp6, a dairy isolate. METHODS AND RESULTS: Small intestinal mucus extracted from rats was used as a substrate for adhesion. Adhesion determinants were studied by physical, chemical and enzymatic pretreatments of the bacteria, and adhesion inhibition assay. The mannose-specific adhesins were explored by studying the effect of d-mannose on adhesion and the yeast-agglutinating ability of the bacteria. It was found that adhesion decreased after bacteria were treated with sodium metaperiodate, protease K, trypsin, lithium chloride and trichloroacetic acid. However, adhesion did not decrease after trypsin-treated bacteria were incubated with cell surface protein extract. Cell surface bound exopolysaccharides were found to inhibit the adhesion. D-mannose inhibited the adhesion in a dose-dependent manner. The bacteria could significantly agglutinate yeast and lost this ability after protease K treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Adhesion was mainly mediated by the mannose specific adhesins, which might be proteins that reversibly bind to the cell surface components. Cell surface-bound exopolysaccharides were also involved in adhesion. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The mannose-specific adhesion of Lact. plantarum Lp6 to rat mucus might be important for competing with pathogens-binding sites in gut, which may be used to resist the colonization of the pathogens.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mannose-specific adherence mediates adherence of L. plantarum to human colonic cell line HT-29, epithelial Caco-2 cells and intestinal mucus in rats and thus assists in intestinal colonization.
“Mannose-specific adherence mediates adherence of L. plantarum to human colonic cell line HT-29, epithelial Caco-2 cells and intestinal mucus in rats and thus assists in intestinal colonization [41, 47, 48].”
From Bistable auto-aggregation phenotype in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum emerges after cultivation in in vitro colonic microbiota (2021) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Sun, J., Le, G.-W., Shi, Y.-H., & Su, G.-W.
- Affiliations
- Jiangnan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Le, G.-W.
- Venue
- Letters in Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-85
- ISSN
- 0266-8254 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2673
- OpenAlex
- W1998626950
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Letters in Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Keywords
- Lactobacillus plantarum, bacterial adhesion, intestinal mucus, exopolysaccharides, cell surface proteins, proteinase K, trypsin, sodium metaperiodate, D-mannose, dairy isolates
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacterial Adhesion, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestine, Small, Mannose, Adhesins, Bacterial, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review