Detection of microbial contaminants in mammalian cell cultures using a new fluorescence-based staining method: Microcolonies detection using fluorescence
Abstract
Aims Microbial contamination of cell culture production processes is a current concern for biopharmaceutical industries. Traditional testing methods require several days to detect contamination and may advantageously be replaced by a rapid detection method. We developed a new method combining membrane filtration to microcolonies fluorescence staining method (MFSM) and compared it to epifluorescence microscopy. Methods and results Both methods were used to detect bacteria in CHO cells cultures. The epifluorescence microscopy showed to be limited by filterability, media interference and nonrobustness issues, whereas MFSM enabled consistent detection of Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Propionibacterium acnes after, respectively, 8, 9 and 48 h of incubation. Thanks to the nondestructive feature of the MFSM, stained membranes could be reincubated on culture media to yield visible colonies used for identification. Conclusions The new method described in this study showed its ability to detect microbial contaminants in cell culture samples with time-to-results from 2-5 times shorter than the traditional testing method. Significance and impact of the study The MFSM can be used as monitoring tool for cell cultures to significantly shorten detection times of microbial contamination, while preserving the ability to identify the contaminants and their viability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Common bacterial contaminants from skin or soil such as Staphylococcus sp. and Bacillus sp. rapidly consume glucose as a carbon source.
“It is important to note that glucose would be rapidly consumed as a carbon source by common bacterial contaminants from skin or soil such as Staphylococcus sp. and Bacillus sp. (Baumstummler et al., 2010; Strasters & Winkler, 1963).”
From Impacts of intentional mycoplasma contamination on CHO cell bioreactor cultures (2019) · cites this paper as Baumstummler et al., 2010
There are many different methods available to test for contaminations.
“There are many different methods available to test for contaminations (Baumstummler et al., 2010; Coté, 2001).”
From Guidance document on Good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0) (2021) · cites this paper as Baumstummler et al., 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidance document on Good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0)
Pamies, D. (2021) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.2111011 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Impacts of intentional mycoplasma contamination on CHO cell bioreactor cultures
Fratz‐Berilla, E. J., Faison, T., Kohnhorst, C. L., Velugula‐Yellela, S. R., Powers, D. N., Brorson, K., & Agarabi, C. (2019) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.27161 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“It is important to note that glucose would be rapidly consumed as a carbon source by common bacterial contaminants from skin or soil such as Staphylococcus sp. and Bacillus sp. (Baumstummler et al., 2010; Strasters & Winkler, 1963).”
- Authors
- Baumstummler, A., Chollet, R., Meder, H., Rofel, C., Venchiarutti, A., & Ribault, S.
- Corresponding author
- Baumstummler, A.
- Venue
- Letters in Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-10-29
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 671-677
- ISSN
- 0266-8254 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1593101964
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Letters in Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
- Keywords
- microbial contamination, fluorescent staining, membrane filtration, microcolonies, CHO cell culture, epifluorescence microscopy, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Propionibacterium acnes, biopharmaceutical manufacturing, rapid detection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacteria, Cricetulus, Culture Media, Filtration, Cricetinae, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Staining and Labeling, CHO Cells, Cell Culture Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review