Cited by 867Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The Hill equation: a review of its capabilities in pharmacological modelling

Goutelle, Sylvain, Maurin, Michel, Rougier, Florent, Barbaut, Xavier, Bourguignon, Laurent, Ducher, Michel, Maire, Pascal·2008·Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

The Hill equation was first introduced by A.V. Hill to describe the equilibrium relationship between oxygen tension and the saturation of haemoglobin. In pharmacology, the Hill equation has been extensively used to analyse quantitative drug–receptor relationships. Many pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic models have used the Hill equation to describe nonlinear drug dose–response relationships. Although the Hill equation is widely used, its many properties are not all well known. This article aims at reviewing the various properties of the Hill equation. The descriptive aspects of the Hill equation, in particular mathematical and graphical properties, are examined, and related to Hill’s original work. The mechanistic aspect of the Hill equation, involving a strong connection with the Guldberg and Waage law of mass action, is also described. Finally, a probabilistic view of the Hill equation is examined. Here, we provide some new calculation results, such as Fisher information and Shannon entropy, and we introduce multivariate probabilistic Hill equations. The main features and potential applications of this probabilistic approach are also discussed. Thus, within the same formalism, the Hill equation has many different properties which can be of great interest for those interested in mathematical modelling in pharmacology and biosciences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2008.00633.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goutelle, S., Maurin, M., Rougier, F., Barbaut, X., Bourguignon, L., Ducher, M., & Maire, P.
Affiliations
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
Corresponding author
Goutelle, Sylvain
Venue
Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11-28
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
633-648
ISSN
  • 0767-3981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-8206
OpenAlex
W2126928912
Cited by
867
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 30
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
Hill equation, dose-response relationship, drug-receptor binding, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling, mass action law, Fisher information, Shannon entropy, stochastic modeling, hemoglobin oxygen saturation
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding Sites, Drug Interactions, Humans, Models, Biological, Oxygen, Oxyhemoglobins, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacology, Probability, Receptors, Cell Surface, Models, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Nonlinear Dynamics, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Risk Assessment, Drug Dosage Calculations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review