The Hill equation: a review of its capabilities in pharmacological modelling
Abstract
The Hill equation was first introduced by A.V. Hill to describe the equilibrium relationship between oxygen tension and the saturation of haemoglobin. In pharmacology, the Hill equation has been extensively used to analyse quantitative drug–receptor relationships. Many pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic models have used the Hill equation to describe nonlinear drug dose–response relationships. Although the Hill equation is widely used, its many properties are not all well known. This article aims at reviewing the various properties of the Hill equation. The descriptive aspects of the Hill equation, in particular mathematical and graphical properties, are examined, and related to Hill’s original work. The mechanistic aspect of the Hill equation, involving a strong connection with the Guldberg and Waage law of mass action, is also described. Finally, a probabilistic view of the Hill equation is examined. Here, we provide some new calculation results, such as Fisher information and Shannon entropy, and we introduce multivariate probabilistic Hill equations. The main features and potential applications of this probabilistic approach are also discussed. Thus, within the same formalism, the Hill equation has many different properties which can be of great interest for those interested in mathematical modelling in pharmacology and biosciences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The upward rebound stems from probabilistic properties of the same Hill function used in recent work on δ18O and δ13C matrix effects in the dolomite-ankerite series.
“w hi c h st e ms fr o m t h e pr o b a bilisti c pr o p erti es of t h e s a m e Hill f u n cti o n (e. g., 3 6 G o ut ell e et al., 2 0 0 8; Hill, 1 9 1 0) us e d i n r e c e nt w or k o n δ 1 8 O a n d δ 1 3 C m atri x eff e cts i n t h e 3 6 d ol o mit e -a n k erit e s eri es ( Śli wi ńs ki et al., 2 0 1 6 a, 2 0 1 6 b).”
From SIMS Bias on Isotope Ratios in Ca‐Mg‐Fe Carbonates (Part III): δ<sup>18</sup>O and δ<sup>13</sup>C Matrix Effects Along the Magnesite–Siderite Solid‐Solution Series (2018) · cites this paper as Goutelle et al., 2008
Cites
Chou, T.-C., & Talalay, P. (1984) · Advances in Enzyme Regulation · doi:10.1016/0065-2571(84)90007-4 · Cited by 7,178 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Experimental Framework for Quantifying Bacterial Tolerance
Brauner, A., Shoresh, N., Fridman, O., & Balaban, N. Q. (2017) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.014 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Kazierad, D. J., Bergman, A., Tan, B., Erion, D. M., Somayaji, V., Lee, D. S., & Rolph, T. (2016) · Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.12672 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Śliwiński, M. G., Kitajima, K., Spicuzza, M. J., Orland, I. J., Ishida, A., Fournelle, J. H., & Valley, J. W. (2018) · Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research · doi:10.1111/ggr.12194 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Novel kinetic studies on biomass hydrothermal carbonization
Gallifuoco, A., & Di Giacomo, G. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.087 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Evans, S. F., Kwok, Y., Solterbeck, A., Pyragius, C., Hull, M. L., Hutchinson, M. R., & Rolan, P. (2021) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s279253 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Lledo‐Garcia, R., Dixon, K., Shock, A., & Oliver, R. (2022) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12739 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goutelle, S., Maurin, M., Rougier, F., Barbaut, X., Bourguignon, L., Ducher, M., & Maire, P.
- Affiliations
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Goutelle, Sylvain
- Venue
- Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11-28
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 633-648
- ISSN
- 0767-3981 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-8206
- OpenAlex
- W2126928912
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 1.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- Hill equation, dose-response relationship, drug-receptor binding, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling, mass action law, Fisher information, Shannon entropy, stochastic modeling, hemoglobin oxygen saturation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Binding Sites, Drug Interactions, Humans, Models, Biological, Oxygen, Oxyhemoglobins, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacology, Probability, Receptors, Cell Surface, Models, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Nonlinear Dynamics, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Risk Assessment, Drug Dosage Calculations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review