Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SOARING BEHAVIOUR AND PERFORMANCE OF SOME EAST AFRICAN BIRDS, OBSERVED FROM A MOTOR‐GLIDER

Pennycuick, C. J.·1972·Ibis

Abstract

Summary: Various species of soaring birds were studied by following them in a motor‐glider, mainly over the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. The characteristics of thermal convection in the study area are described in general terms. The two vulture species of the genus Gyps live by scavenging among the herds of migratory ungulates, especially Wildebeest. They are not territorial, and gather in large numbers on kills. When raising young they may be obliged by game movements to forage at long distances from their nests. Their cross‐country performance is adequate for a foraging radius of over 100 km in dry‐season conditions. Their ability to compete with Spotted Hyaenas is thought to depend partly on this factor and partly on an advantage in arriving early at kills. These two species appear to find food more by watching other vultures than by searching for it directly. The Lappet‐faced and White‐headed Vultures are thought to be sedentary, and to depend on thorough searching of a fixed foraging territory, rather than on following migratory game. They have lower wing loadings than the Gyps vultures, and were not seen cross‐country flying. They never gather in large numbers. The Hooded Vulture is a solitary nester, but it does fly across country, and does gather at kills. Vultures soar individually, and seem to be good at exploiting such phenomena as thermal streets. They do not travel in flocks. Tawny and Martial Eagles react positively to the glider, and are suspected of regarding it as potential prey. White Storks migrate between Europe and Africa, and also travel about within East Africa, by thermal soaring. They soar in flocks, and unlike vultures rely on co‐ordinated social behaviour to locate thermals. In choosing their route, they often fail to react to obvious weather signs. They enter cumulus clouds from the bottom when thermalling, but probably do not climb far above cloudbase. Marabou Storks soar individually, but also sometimes travel in flocks. When doing so, they show less lateral spreading than White Storks, which reduces the effectiveness of the flock as a thermal‐finding unit; on the other hand, they do seem to react to visible weather signs, like vultures or glider pilots. White Pelicans, which travel by thermal soaring between different lakes in the Rift Valley, show the most highly co‐ordinated social soaring behaviour. Unlike White Storks, they fly in formation even when circling. Storks and pelicans showed more signs of alarm when approached by the glider than did the vultures or birds of prey. This could be due to their being preyed upon in flight, for instance by Martial Eagles. The basis of conventional thermal cross‐country flying is outlined, and it is explained why the high wing loadings of the Gyps vultures are appropriate to their peripatetic habits. A method of thermal soaring without circling is discussed, and shown to be more readily feasible for small than for large birds. Some differences in soaring techniques between birds and glider pilots are interpreted in the light of this calculation. A case in which Black Kites apparently used this technique to soar in random turbulence is described. The cross‐country speed attainable by thermal soaring should be similar to the cruising speed under power in both large and small birds. Rough calculations of the energy costs suggest that a large bird (White Stork) should reduce its fuel consumption by a factor of 23 by soaring rather than flying under power, whereas this factor would be only 2–4 for a small bird (Bonelli's Warbler). Other reasons why thermal soaring is an advantageous means of travel for large but not for small birds are also indicated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1474-919x.1972.tb02603.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Brown L. H., 1970, African birds of prey
  2. Curry‐Lindahl K., 1971, he prey of the martial eagle, Africana, 4, 8
  3. Din N. A.1970.General biology of two species of pelicans(Pelecanus onocrotalusandP. rufescent)in western Uganda.M.Sc. thesis Makerere University.
  4. Drew H., 1968, Four reasons why the vortex‐ring theory is nonsense, Sailpl. Gliding, 19, 205
  5. Gibson J., 1970, Ribble Estuary thermals, Sailpl. Gliding, 21, 416
  6. Grossman M. L., 1965, Birds of prey of the world
  7. Houston D. C.1971.Ecology of vultures in the Serengeti.D.Phil thesis University of Oxford.
  8. Irving F. G., 1968, The vorticist's reply, Sailpl. Gliding, 19, 206
  9. James B., 1968, Vortex‐ring nonsense, Sailpl. Gliding, 19, 335
  10. James B., 1970, Down with bubbles, Sailpl. Gliding, 21, 494
  11. Klemperer W. B.1958.A review of the theory of dynamic soaring.Organisation Scientifique et Technique du Vol a Voile Publ.5.
  12. Kruuk H., 1967, The competition for food between vultures (Aegypiinae) in East Africa, Ardea, 55, 171
  13. Kruuk H., 1972, The Spotted Hyaena
  14. Kuettner J. P., 1967, Cloudstreets, Schweizer Aerorevue, 42, 52
  15. 10.1175/1520-0469(1959)016<0653:SVTOBL>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1959)016<0653:svtobl>2.0.co;2
  16. Pennycuick C. J., 1972, Animal flight
  17. Pennycuick C. J., 1972, Avian Biology
  18. Prandtl L., 1934, Fundamentals of hydro‐and aeromechanics
  19. Scorer R. S., 1958, Natural aerodynamics
  20. Watts I. E. M., 1955, Equatorial weather
  21. Welch A., 1968, New soaring pilot
  22. 10.1002/qj.49708536407 · doi:10.1002/qj.49708536407

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Pennycuick, C. J.
Venue
Ibis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1972-04
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
178-218
ISSN
  • 0019-1019 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-919X
OpenAlex
W2067892964
Cited by
301
References
16
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SOARING BEHAVIOUR AND PERFORMANCE OF SOME EAST AFRICAN BIRDS, OBSERVED FROM A MOTOR‐GLIDER. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1474-919x.1972.tb02603.x
The paper
Pennycuick, C. J. (1972). SOARING BEHAVIOUR AND PERFORMANCE OF SOME EAST AFRICAN BIRDS, OBSERVED FROM A MOTOR‐GLIDER. Ibis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.1972.tb02603.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.