The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Information needs to support environmental impact assessment of the effects of European marine offshore wind farms on birds
Abstract
European legislation requires Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs) of national offshore wind farm (OWF) programmes and Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) for individual projects likely to affect birds. SEAs require extensive mapping of waterbird densities to define breeding and feeding areas of importance and sensitivity. Use of extensive large scale weather, military, and air traffic control surveillance radar is recommended, to define areas, routes and behaviour of migrating birds, and to determine avian migration corridors in three dimensions. EIAs for individual OWFs should define the key avian species present; as well as assess the hazards presented to birds in terms of avoidance behaviour, habitat change and collision risk. Such measures, however, are less helpful in assessing cumulative impacts. Using aerial survey, physical habitat loss, modification, or gain and effective habitat loss through avoidance behaviour can be measured using bird densities as a proxy measure of habitat availability. The energetic consequences of avoidance responses and habitat change should be modelled to estimate fitness costs and predict impacts at the population level. Our present ability to model collision risk remains poor due to lack of data on species‐specific avoidance responses. There is therefore an urgent need to gather data on avoidance responses; energetic consequences of habitat modification and avoidance flights and demographic sensitivity of key species, most affected by OWFs. This analysis stresses the importance of common data collection protocols, sharing of information and experience, and accessibility of results at the international level to better improve our predictive abilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Large-Scale Offshore Wind Power in the United States: Assessment of Opportunities and Barriers
Musial, W., & Ram, B. (2010) · doi:10.2172/990101 · Cited by 276
Migratory marine species: their status, threats and conservation management needs
Lascelles, B., Notarbartolo Di Sciara, G., Agardy, T., Cuttelod, A., Eckert, S., Glowka, L., Hoyt, E., Llewellyn, F., Louzao, M., Ridoux, V., et al. (2014) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.2512 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- FOX, A. D., DESHOLM, M., KAHLERT, J., CHRISTENSEN, T. K., & KRAG PETERSEN, I.
- Venue
- Ibis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 129-144
- ISSN
- 0019-1019 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-919X
- OpenAlex
- W2142021246
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information needs to support environmental impact assessment of the effects of European marine offshore wind farms on birds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2006.00510.x
- The paper
- FOX, A. D., DESHOLM, M., KAHLERT, J., CHRISTENSEN, T. K., & KRAG PETERSEN, I. (2006). Information needs to support environmental impact assessment of the effects of European marine offshore wind farms on birds. Ibis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2006.00510.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.