Cited by 23Nuclear Structure and FunctionDNA Repair MechanismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

Replication factor C1, the large subunit of replication factor C, is proteolytically truncated in Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome

Open access
Tang, Hui, Hilton, Benjamin, Musich, Phillip R., Fang, Ding Zhi, Zou, Yue·2012·Aging Cell

Abstract

Summary: Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a rare genetic disorder because of a LMNA gene mutation that produces a mutant lamin A protein (progerin). Progerin also has been correlated to physiological aging and related diseases. However, how progerin causes the progeria remains unknown. Here, we report that the large subunit (RFC1) of replication factor C is cleaved in HGPS cells, leading to the production of a truncated RFC1 of ∼ 75 kDa, which appears to be defective in loading proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and pol δ onto DNA for replication. Interestingly, the cleavage can be inhibited by a serine protease inhibitor, suggesting that RFC1 is cleaved by a serine protease. Because of the crucial role of RFC in DNA replication, our findings provide a mechanistic interpretation for the observed early replicative arrest and premature aging phenotypes of HPGS and may lead to novel strategies in HGPS treatment. Furthermore, this unique truncated form of RFC1 may serve as a potential marker for HGPS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00779.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 23

Authors
Tang, H., Hilton, B., Musich, P. R., Fang, D. Z., & Zou, Y.
Affiliations
  • East Tennessee State University (US)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zou, Yue
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-13
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
363-365
ISSN
  • 1474-9718 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-9726
OpenAlex
W2132773091
Cited by
23
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG031503, R03AG031503)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome, replication factor C, RFC1, progerin, LMNA mutations, serine protease cleavage, DNA replication, premature aging, diagnostic biomarkers
MeSH terms
Cell Line, Humans, Progeria, Replication Protein C, Prenylation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review