The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pantoscopic tilt in spectacle-corrected myopia and its effect on peripheral refraction
Open accessAbstract
Spectacles are a common option for the correction of myopia in children and young adults. Visual scientists striving to explain the process of emmetropization and myopia progression have been interested in peripheral refraction, as well as on‐axis performance. Using a ray tracing technique and mathematical eye models for myopia, this study assessed the effect of pantoscopic tilt on peripheral refraction in spectacle‐corrected myopia. At the centre and throughout the periphery of corrected models, hyperopic shifts in the mean spherical equivalent component were found in all meridians. Horizontally, hyperopic shift tends to incline uniformly with the increase in pantoscopic tilt, but this did not occur in the other meridians. No change in the trend of the horizontal J180 refraction component was found with changes in pantoscopic tilt among all myopic errors. The J45 component produced considerable shifts in the horizontal periphery, which increased with increase in pantoscopic tilt. The ray tracing technique provides considerable information about the relationship between peripheral refraction and aberrations, with the tilt of the correcting spectacle lens. Larger degree of tilt on high myopic prescriptions seems to produce considerable non‐uniform, hyperopic shifts, along with astigmatism and coma, in the peripheral visual field. These effects may be sufficient to play a role in the progression of myopia; however, further studies are required to fully understand this relationship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The effect of frame and fit is taken into account, and the advantages of FFLs in the periphery become more pronounced for larger frames, greater wrap angles, and more tilted pantoscopic angles than fits defined as 'standard' for ASLs are designed for [22,40].”
From Freeform vs. Aspheric Spectacle Lenses: A Comprehensive Review of Optical Performance, Clinical Outcomes, and Patient Considerations (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peripheral refraction along the horizontal and vertical visual fields in myopia
Atchison, D. A., Pritchard, N., & Schmid, K. L. (2006) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.023 · Cited by 285
Peripheral refraction and ocular shape in children.
Mutti, D. O., Sholtz, R. I., Friedman, N. E., & Zadnik, K. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 278
Peripheral refractive errors in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic young subjects
Seidemann, A., Schaeffel, F., Guirao, A., Lopez-Gil, N., & Artal, P. (2002) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.19.002363 · Cited by 266
Chromatic dispersions of the ocular media of human eyes
Atchison, D. A., & Smith, G. (2005) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.22.000029 · Cited by 226
Optical models for human myopic eyes
Atchison, D. A. (2006) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.004 · Cited by 182
Monochromatic aberrations of human eyes in the horizontal visual field
Atchison, D. A., & Scott, D. H. (2002) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.19.002180 · Cited by 108
Peripheral astigmatism in emmetropic eyes
Gustafsson, J., Terenius, E., Buchheister, J., et al. (2001) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00606.x · Cited by 100
Peripheral refraction for distance and near vision in emmetropes and myopes
CALVER, R. I., Radhakrishnan, H., Osuobeni, E. P., et al. (2007) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00518.x · Cited by 78
Measuring ocular aberrations in the peripheral visual field using Hartmann-Shack aberrometry
Atchison, D. A., Scott, D. H., & Charman, W. N. (2007) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.24.002963 · Cited by 55
Hartmann–Shack technique and refraction across the horizontal visual field
Atchison, D. A., Scott, D. H., & Charman, W. N. (2003) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.20.000965 · Cited by 46
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fannin T. E., 1996, Clinical Optics
- 10.1097/00006324-199310000-00002 · DOI
Cited by
Does visual acuity predict visual preference in progressive addition lenses?
Legras, R., Vincent, M., & Marin, G. (2023) · Journal of Optometry · doi:10.1016/j.optom.2022.04.003 · Cited by 7
Ladopoulos, K., Pateras, E., & Ninos, G. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.104008
“The effect of frame and fit is taken into account, and the advantages of FFLs in the periphery become more pronounced for larger frames, greater wrap angles, and more tilted pantoscopic angles than fits defined as 'standard' for ASLs are designed for [22,40].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakaraju, R. C., Ehrmann, K., Ho, A., & Papas, E. B.
- Affiliations
- Brien Holden Vision Institute (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Bakaraju, Ravi C.
- Venue
- Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
- Published
- 2008-10-29
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 538-549
- ISSN
- 0275-5408 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-1313
- OpenAlex
- W1800831200
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of New South Wales
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- spectacle lenses, myopia, peripheral refraction, hyperopic shift, spherical equivalent, astigmatism, coma, high myopia, myopia progression, emmetropization, ray tracing
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Eyeglasses, Humans, Myopia, Refraction, Ocular, Refractive Errors, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
