The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Soil acidification during more than 100 years under permanent grassland and woodland at Rothamsted
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Soil samples have been taken periodically from unlimed plots of the 130‐year‐old Park Grass Experiment and from the 100‐year‐old Geescroft Wilderness at Rothamsted. Changes in the pH of the samples show how acidification has progressed. The soils are now at, or are approaching, equilibrium pH values which depend on the acidifying inputs and on the buffering capacities of the soils. We have calculated the contributions to soil acidification of natural sources of acidity in the soil, atmospheric deposition, crop growth and nutrient removal, and, where applicable, additions of fertilizers. The relative importance of each source of acidification has changed as the soils have become more acid. Acid rain (wet deposited acidity) is a negligible source, but total atmospheric deposition may comprise up to 30% of acidifying inputs at near neutral soil pH values and more as soil pH decreases. Excepting fertilizers, the greatest causes of soil acidification at or near neutral pH values are the natural inputs of H + from the dissolution of CO 2 and subsequent dissociation of carbonic acid, and the mineralization of organic matter. Under grassland, single superphosphate and small amounts of sodium and magnesium sulphates have had no effect on soil pH, whilst potassium sulphate increased soil acidity slightly. All of these effects are greatly outweighed under grassland, however, by those of nitrogen fertilizers. Against a background of acidification from atmospheric, crop and natural inputs, nitrogen applied as ammonium sulphate decreased soil pH up to a maximum of 1.2 units at a rate in direct proportion to the amount added, and nitrogen applied as sodium nitrate increased soil pH by between 0.5 and 1 unit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity
Huston, M. A. (1997) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050180 · Cited by 1,772
Goulding, K. W. T. (2016) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12270 · Cited by 874
Self-citationPhoenix, G. K., Emmett, B. A., Britton, A. J., Caporn, S. J. M., Dise, N. B., Helliwell, R., Jones, L., Leake, J. R., Leith, I. D., Sheppard, L. J., et al. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02590.x · Cited by 435
Flinn, K. M., Vellend, M., & Marks, P. L. (2005) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01198.x · Cited by 106
Short-term effects of nitrogen on methane oxidation in soils
Tlustos, P., Willison, T. W., Baker, J. C., Murphy, D. V., Pavlikova, D., Goulding, K. W. T., & Powlson, D. S. (1998) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s003740050464 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnston, A. E., Goulding, K. W. T., & Poulton, P. R.
- Venue
- Soil Use and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-03
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-10
- ISSN
- 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2743
- OpenAlex
- W1996324194
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil acidification during more than 100 years under permanent grassland and woodland at Rothamsted. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1986.tb00669.x
- The paper
- Johnston, A. E., Goulding, K. W. T., & Poulton, P. R. (1986). Soil acidification during more than 100 years under permanent grassland and woodland at Rothamsted. Soil Use and Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1986.tb00669.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.