The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-term effects of compost amendment of soil on functional and structural diversity and microbial activity
Open accessAbstract
We studied the effects of applying different composts (urban organic waste, green waste, manure and sewage sludge), mineral fertilizer and compost plus mineral fertilizer on chemical, biological and soil microbiological parameters over a 12‐year period. The organic C and total N levels in soils were increased by all compost and compost + N treatments. Microbial biomass C was significantly ( P ≤ 0.05) increased for some compost treatments. In addition, basal respiration and the metabolic quotient (qCO 2 ) were significantly higher in all soils that had received sewage sludge compost. The Shannon diversity index ( H ), based on community level physiological profiling, showed a higher consumption of carbon sources in soils treated with compost and compost + N compared with the control. The utilization of different guilds of carbon sources varied amongst the treatments (compost, compost + N or mineral fertilizer). Cluster analysis of polymerase chain reaction‐denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis patterns showed two major clusters, the first containing the mineral fertilization and compost treatments, and the second, the composts + N treatments. No differences in bacterial community structure could be determined between the different types of compost. However, the results suggest that long‐term compost treatments do have effects on the soil biota. The results indicate that the effects on the qCO 2 may be due to shifts in community composition. In this study, it was not possible to distinguish with certainty between the effects of different composts except for compost derived from sewage sludge.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a long-term Austrian field study, DGGE analysis showed no major changes in microbial communities after >10 years of amendment with different compost types.
“In a long-term field study in Austria, microbial communities did not show major changes according to denaturing gradient gel electrophorese (DGGE) analysis after soil was amended with different types of compost (bio waste, green waste, manure, sewage sludge) over >10 years (Ros et al., 2006).”
From Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides (2021) · cites this paper as Ros et al., 2006
Mineral N had a greater effect on the microbial community than compost amendment.
“Instead, mineral N had a greater effect on the microbial community.”
From Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides (2021) · cites this paper as Ros et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- 10.1016/S1164-5563(03)00026-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0038-0717(78)90098-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0038-0717(90)90094-G · DOI
- 10.1016/S0098-8472(00)00080-0 · DOI
- 10.1080/00380768.1996.10414693 · DOI
- Barriuso E., 1988, Actividad Ureasa especifica de suelo, Agrochimica, 32, 284
- Beck T., 1984, Fifth symposium on soil biology, Jasi 1981
- 10.1017/S0021859699007492 · DOI
- Bochner B., 1989, ‘Breathprints’ at the microbial level, ASM News, 55, 536
- Bossio D.A., 1995, Impact of carbon and flooding on the metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61, 4043, 10.1128/aem.61.11.4043-4050.1995 · DOI
- Breure A.M., 2005, Vital soil, function value and properties
- 10.1007/BF00369419 · DOI
- 10.1002/1522-2624(200006)163:3<313::AID-JPLN313>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0167-7012(97)00041-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00374-004-0759-x · DOI
- 10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500020025x · DOI
- 10.1007/s003740100413 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.64.12.4950-4957.1998 · DOI
- 10.1007/s002489900090 · DOI
- Fließbach A., 1997, Microbial communities. Functional versus structural approaches
- 10.1080/02827588809382517 · DOI
- 10.1177/0734242X9401200602 · DOI
- 10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200030018x · DOI
- Garcia C., 2000, Research and perspectives of soil enzymology in Spain, 41
- 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00165-6 · DOI
- Garland J.I., 1991, Classification and characterisation of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community level sole carbon source utilization, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 57, 2351, 10.1128/aem.57.8.2351-2359.1991 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1800-1809.2003 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00160-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02214547 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00133-5 · DOI
- Innerebner G., 2005, Traceability of ammonia oxidizing bacteria in compost treated soils, Soil Biology & Biochemistry
- Insam H., 1996, Methods in soil biology
- 10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00029-5 · DOI
- Insam H., 2004, Molecular microbial ecology manual
- Insam H., 1991, Relationship of soil microbial biomass and activity with fertilisation practice and crop yield of tree ultisols, Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 32, 1131
- 10.1016/0038-0717(95)00182-4 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00374-005-0857-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0929-1393(02)00018-5 · DOI
- Kompostverordnung, 2002, Österreichisches Bundesgesetzblatt II 292/2001
- 10.1300/J064v26n04_04 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1022608828694 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.watres.2004.10.003 · DOI
- Muyzer G., 1993, Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analyses of polymerase chain reaction‐amplified genes for 16S rRNA, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59, 695, 10.1128/aem.59.3.695-700.1993 · DOI
- Nannipieri P., 1990, Soil biochemistry
- Nannipieri P., 2002, Enzymes in the environment‐activity, ecology and applications
- Nielsen M.N., 2002, Microorganisms as indicators of soil health
- Niemi M., 1996, Abstract volume of the SUBMECO meeting
- 10.1081/PLN-100103663 · DOI
- 10.1007/s003740050268 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00082-3 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1004752531903 · DOI
- 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90076-9 · DOI
- Preston‐Mafham J., 2002, Analysis of microbial community functional diversity using sole‐carbon‐source utilisation profiles – a critique, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 42, 1
- 10.1007/978-3-662-08724-4_4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00267-002-2839-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00298-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Sanguinetti C.J., 1994, Rapid silver staining and recovery for PCR products separated on polyacrylamide gels, BioTechniques, 17, 915
- Schwieger F., 1998, A new approach to utilize PCR‐single‐strand conformation polymorphism for 16S rRNA gene‐based microbial community analysis, Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 64, 4870, 10.1128/AEM.64.12.4870-4876.1998 · DOI
- Shannon C.E., 1963, The mathematical theory of communication
- 10.1007/s002489900085 · DOI
- Smith L.J., 1993, Soil microbial ecology
- 10.1016/S0929-1393(99)00007-4 · DOI
- 10.1007/s003740050350 · DOI
- 10.1214/aoms/1177706875 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845 · DOI
- 10.1016/0038-0717(95)00093-T · DOI
- 10.1016/0038-0717(94)90131-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00374-004-0746-2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Siedt, M., Schäffer, A., Smith, K. E. C., Nabel, M., Roß-Nickoll, M., & van Dongen, J. T. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141607 · Cited by 563
Restoration of Soil Quality Using Biochar and Brown Coal Waste: A Review
Amoah-Antwi, C., Kwiatkowska-Malina, J., Thornton, S. F., Fenton, O., Malina, G., & Szara, E. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137852 · Cited by 236
Klammsteiner, T., Turan, V., Fernández-Delgado Juárez, M., Oberegger, S., & Insam, H. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10101578 · Cited by 223
Self-citationBolan, N. S., Kunhikrishnan, A., Choppala, G. K., Thangarajan, R., & Chung, J. W. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.061 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Ros, M., Klammer, S., Knapp, B., Aichberger, K., & Insam, H.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Universität Innsbruck (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Ros, M.
- Venue
- Soil Use and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-218
- ISSN
- 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2743
- OpenAlex
- W2118141257
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 16.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Soil Use and Management (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Austrian Science Fund
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Keywords
- compost application, long-term soil amendment, sewage sludge compost, urban organic waste, green waste, manure, mineral fertilizers, soil microbial biomass carbon, basal respiration, metabolic quotient, community-level physiological profiles, bacterial community structure, soil organic carbon, soil nitrogen, soil functional diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review