The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is conservation tillage suitable for organic farming? A review
Abstract
Conservation tillage covers a range of tillage practices, mostly non‐inversion, which aim to conserve soil moisture and reduce soil erosion by leaving more than one‐third of the soil surface covered by crop residues. Organic farmers are encouraged to adopt conservation tillage to preserve soil quality and fertility and to prevent soil degradation – mainly erosion and compaction. The potential advantages of conservation tillage in organic farming are reduced erosion, greater macroporosity in the soil surface due to larger number of earthworms, more microbial activity and carbon storage, less run‐off and leaching of nutrients, reduced fuel use and faster tillage. The disadvantages of conservation tillage in organic farming are greater pressure from grass weeds, less suitable than ploughing for poorly drained, unstable soils or high rainfall areas, restricted N availability and restricted crop choice. The success of conservation tillage in organic farming hinges on the choice of crop rotation to ensure weed and disease control and nitrogen availability. Rotation of tillage depth according to crop type, in conjunction with compaction control measures is also required. A high standard of management is required, tailored to local soil and site conditions. Innovative approaches for the application of conservation tillage, such as perennial mulches, mechanical control of cover crops, rotational tillage and controlled traffic, require further practical assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soil compaction in cropping systems
Hamza, M. A., & Anderson, W. K. (2005) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.08.009 · Cited by 1,889
Soil organic matter and structural stability: mechanisms and implications for management
Oades, J. M. (1984) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf02205590 · Cited by 1,624
Soil organic matter and structural stability: mechanisms and implications for management
Oades, J. M. (1984) · Biological Processes and Soil Fertility · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-6101-2_28 · Cited by 1,513
Aggregate and Soil Organic Matter Dynamics under Conventional and No‐Tillage Systems
Six, J., Elliott, E. T., & Paustian, K. (1999) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1999.6351350x · Cited by 1,474
Relationship of soil organic matter dynamics to physical protection and tillage
Balesdent, J., Chenu, C., & Balabane, M. (2000) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(99)00107-5 · Cited by 1,288
The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: reviewing the evidence
Holland, J. M. (2004) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2003.12.018 · Cited by 1,062
Soil organic matter stratification ratio as an indicator of soil quality
Franzluebbers, A. J. (2002) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(02)00018-1 · Cited by 937
Kromp, B. (1999) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00037-7 · Cited by 915
Water infiltration and soil structure related to organic matter and its stratification with depth
Franzluebbers, A. J. (2002) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(02)00027-2 · Cited by 834
Tillage systems and soil ecology
Kladivko, E. J. (2001) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(01)00179-9 · Cited by 746
Cited by
Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review
Wezel, A., Casagrande, M., Celette, F., Vian, J.-F., Ferrer, A., & Peigné, J. (2014) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7 · Cited by 1,227
Self-citationMany shades of gray—The context-dependent performance of organic agriculture
Seufert, V., & Ramankutty, N. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602638 · Cited by 523
Earthworm services for cropping systems. A review
Bertrand, M., Barot, S., Blouin, M., Whalen, J., de Oliveira, T., & Roger-Estrade, J. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-014-0269-7 · Cited by 353
Self-citationXia, Y., Zhang, M., Tsang, D. C. W., Geng, N., Lu, D., Zhu, L., Igalavithana, A. D., Dissanayake, P. D., Rinklebe, J., Yang, X., et al. (2020) · Applied Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1186/s13765-020-0493-6 · Cited by 339
Gowing, J. W., & Palmer, M. (2008) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00137.x · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Peigné, J., Ball, B. C., Roger‐Estrade, J., & David, C.
- Venue
- Soil Use and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-27
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-144
- ISSN
- 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2743
- OpenAlex
- W2132553730
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 17.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is conservation tillage suitable for organic farming? A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00082.x
- The paper
- Peigné, J., Ball, B. C., Roger‐Estrade, J., & David, C. (2007). Is conservation tillage suitable for organic farming? A review. Soil Use and Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00082.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.